by jfrey40535
I know this has been discussed before but could we rehash this one....
SEPTA recently took down the signals at Fox Chase which protected trains north of Rhawn St (hasn't been protecting much in 25 years...). The signals were kept active until they came down. I forget if this was a CP for SEPTA, but does anyone know why they were kept active for such a long period, and why they were recently taken down?
The southbound signals north of Rhawn are dead. I assume maintenance stopped in 1983. Are there any SEPTA signal maintainers in here?
There's been a bit of activity at Fox Chase over the past year, none of it good of course. Most recently, SEPTA moved the termination of the catenary to immediately north of Rhawn Street, with the installation of a new steel beam square on center of the track formerly used by the Fox Chase Rapid Transit trains (prior to 1981 the trains ran through on the main track).
So why change the catenary configuration now? If the change is permenant, why must it still extend over Rhawn street (isn't this addional liability, maintenance?). We of course would like to see the opposite (extend it north!).
Yet with all the changes, the crossing protection is still intact (if you can call it that...does it still work?), and the tracks have not been paved over (last "surviving" crossing on the Newtown line).
SEPTA recently took down the signals at Fox Chase which protected trains north of Rhawn St (hasn't been protecting much in 25 years...). The signals were kept active until they came down. I forget if this was a CP for SEPTA, but does anyone know why they were kept active for such a long period, and why they were recently taken down?
The southbound signals north of Rhawn are dead. I assume maintenance stopped in 1983. Are there any SEPTA signal maintainers in here?
There's been a bit of activity at Fox Chase over the past year, none of it good of course. Most recently, SEPTA moved the termination of the catenary to immediately north of Rhawn Street, with the installation of a new steel beam square on center of the track formerly used by the Fox Chase Rapid Transit trains (prior to 1981 the trains ran through on the main track).
So why change the catenary configuration now? If the change is permenant, why must it still extend over Rhawn street (isn't this addional liability, maintenance?). We of course would like to see the opposite (extend it north!).
Yet with all the changes, the crossing protection is still intact (if you can call it that...does it still work?), and the tracks have not been paved over (last "surviving" crossing on the Newtown line).