jfrey40535 wrote:The pay-leave system needs to go. Its more like "pay-never" as I've seen crowds of 5-10 people walk off the 100 without paying (108 & 113 are pretty bad too). SEPTA knows how bad the problem is but does nothing.
I don't see how pay-enter would be any better. It's not really worth their time and falling behind schedule to throw a passenger off who walks
onto the train without paying.
I think a large part of the problem is that people aren't used to it since only Victory lines have the system, and they forget they need to pay; it's probably in many cases not malicious fare evasion. Pittsburgh, which uses the pay-exit concept system-wide I've noticed doesn't have nearly the problem with it that SEPTA does. On buses, it's not difficult to prevent someone from exiting (when I've seen someone unable to pay on PAT, he rides along to either the garage or the terminal point where transit police meet the bus); on the 100, it would be a little more difficult to prevent exiting given the position of the doors, but I'm sure something could be worked out.
It really is a very good idea in a multi-zone hub/spoke system. Execution is the problem.
And alone, I wouldn't say it makes 69th Street itself better or worse.
-asg