• Multi-Level Cars—Delivery/Status

  • Discussion related to New Jersey Transit rail and light rail operations.
Discussion related to New Jersey Transit rail and light rail operations.

Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a

  by 7 Train
 
First bi-level car delivered
It's on the NJ Transit home page with a photo:
Image
NJ TRANSIT's first bi-level rail car has been delivered! The car will be unveiled at a public ceremony in September. Stay tuned to this site for details!

  by Nasadowsk
 
Dang that looks UGLY
  by 4 Express
 
I'm with you on that one.

  by E-44
 
Looks like a pregnant C5. Maybe they should have called it the C5.5?

  by BigDell
 
I'm sorry, I'm sure its been mentioned before, but who built these things?
Just curious who the manufacturer is....

BigDell

  by BigDell
 
Okay, found it - Bombardier.

Hard to see what they really look like. Curious to see them painted and in person....

  by nick11a
 
Bombardier built them but the design is based off of the Comet Vs- Alstom. But I'm hopeful they'll be much more reliable than the Vs being that Bombardier built them.

And while yes, I do agree, the picture isn't very flattering, I'm gonna hold on passing judgement.

And also, judging by the photo, this is the first Comet/Shorliner/Pullman based design car ever that doesn't have the "curved" doors. The doors are flat.

  by sullivan1985
 
Give it a chance, that photo hardly does any justice for it. Lets hope it looks better in some newer photos and operates smoother than the C-V's

  by Olton Hall
 
nick11a wrote:Bombardier built them but the design is based off of the Comet Vs- Alstom. But I'm hopeful they'll be much more reliable than the Vs being that Bombardier built them.

And while yes, I do agree, the picture isn't very flattering, I'm gonna hold on passing judgement.

And also, judging by the photo, this is the first Comet/Shorliner/Pullman based design car ever that doesn't have the "curved" doors. The doors are flat.
Did Bombardier use the same suppliers as Alstom? If they use the same bad suppliers, that would indicate simular problems.

Not having the curved door and based on the photo also, these cars are a overall a little narrower than the rest of the fleet. Same loading gage but the interior will be a few inches less wide which won't be an issue as they have 2+2 seating and people won't notice the lose of room.

  by nick11a
 
Olton Hall wrote:Did Bombardier use the same suppliers as Alstom? If they use the same bad suppliers, that would indicate simular problems.

Not having the curved door and based on the photo also, these cars are a overall a little narrower than the rest of the fleet. Same loading gage but the interior will be a few inches less wide which won't be an issue as they have 2+2 seating and people won't notice the lose of room.
I hope not.

And the lack of "curves" makes the cars seem more unnatractive to me. I miss the curves.

  by sixty-six
 
i dont know, i kind of like it...

yet again, along with the C5s, i like everything you all hate :-D

  by nick11a
 
I like the DESIGN and the LOOK of the Comet Vs. I just hate the execution of them.

  by 4 Express
 
jimzim66 wrote:i dont know, i kind of like it...

yet again, along with the C5s, i like everything you all hate :-D
That's the same case with me then.

  by sixty-six
 
ok nick, ill give you that one, ha. i do hate how theyre having all the problems and prove unreliable at times.

  by njt5140
 
Wow, it's a Comet V on steroids! Let's hope they turn out nothing like the V's with their hundreds of problems!
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 290