by leviramsey
(Perhaps this is better for the diner economics thread, but...)
Diners could conceivably be more profitable on the Regionals (and the state-supported day trains) than on overnight LDs, simply because the diner imposes costs (staff, HEP draw for refrigeration, etc.) for every hour that it's rolling whether it's earning money or not. On top of that, I suspect that the trains with wealthier ridership will see more coach passengers opting for diner-type service.
Also, I don't see why diner service can't be restored to the NE Regional and/or NEC-related day trains while the extra Viewdiners serve as wreck protects. If there's a wreck than an NER/Vermonter/Pennsylvanian/Palmetto/Maple Leaf/Adirondack loses a diner.
Diners could conceivably be more profitable on the Regionals (and the state-supported day trains) than on overnight LDs, simply because the diner imposes costs (staff, HEP draw for refrigeration, etc.) for every hour that it's rolling whether it's earning money or not. On top of that, I suspect that the trains with wealthier ridership will see more coach passengers opting for diner-type service.
Also, I don't see why diner service can't be restored to the NE Regional and/or NEC-related day trains while the extra Viewdiners serve as wreck protects. If there's a wreck than an NER/Vermonter/Pennsylvanian/Palmetto/Maple Leaf/Adirondack loses a diner.