by edbac333
While perusing PE Lynch's "Passenger Trains of the New Haven" today I was closely looking at some pictures shot in my home turf,particularly pages 100 and 102 when it dawned on me that these pictures could not possibly have been taken without trespassing.
These days trespassing is very much frowned upon in the railfan community,but how about back in the old days when these shots were taken?Was it less frowned upon in general? Were railfans more likely to have common sense and it did not need to an issue?Less railfans?
How about trespassing on private(non railroad ) property to get a vantage point?
Was it that certain photographers had permission from the railroad?
There are many shots in many books that fall into this catagory and I was wondering how this could be without trespassing.
Please do NOT turn this into a discussion of trespassing today.We've beaten that dead horse enough.
Thank You,
Edward Baclawski
These days trespassing is very much frowned upon in the railfan community,but how about back in the old days when these shots were taken?Was it less frowned upon in general? Were railfans more likely to have common sense and it did not need to an issue?Less railfans?
How about trespassing on private(non railroad ) property to get a vantage point?
Was it that certain photographers had permission from the railroad?
There are many shots in many books that fall into this catagory and I was wondering how this could be without trespassing.
Please do NOT turn this into a discussion of trespassing today.We've beaten that dead horse enough.
Thank You,
Edward Baclawski