Pacobell73 wrote:
Those diesels were not nixed due to a lack of riders, that is for sure.
Quite the opposite.
Though it wasn't the sole cause, it contributed to the main cause: low ridership = poor farebox recovery = need for increasing operating subsidy = the service being an obvious downsizing target in an era of increased federal reluctance to subsidize public transportation. As the table on
page 44 of the very same book demonstrates, the values in the
Average Number of Weekday Rides column on that page harms your claim. I noticed that a scan of that page is conspicuously absent from your original post.
At the time Mr. Pawson wrote his book, SEPTA intercity diesel ridership was generally poor. This was greatly influenced by the low number of trains to choose from on each intercity route, the chilling effect that had upon long-term ridership trends & the weaknesses of traditional "radial" passenger service, and the very substantial difficulty in making any significant expansion of the diesel fleet. It's hard to ride a train that's not in the timetable, especially if the ones that actually are in the timetable are not useful for your own origin/destination time needs. I want to emphasize that I am
not claiming that this is the only reason the intercity trains were discontinued;
far from it. However, the myth of SEPTA diesel intercity trains
all being well-patronized - yet
still being cruelly cut from service, as if by sadistic comic-book villains - is not borne out by the facts, and such folklore or wishful thinking only clouds the real issues.
In 1978, the three diesel intercity services between Reading Terminal and Newark NJ, Bethlehem-Allentown and Reading-Pottsville carried an average of only 3,000 weekday riders.
Consider also the
number of daily weekday trains in both directions on the three diesel intercity routes. Again in 1978, all of them combined add up to only 36 trains per day in both directions.
Compare that to the contemporaneous stats for the electric ex-RDG Conshohocken-Norristown route, whose single line of service was then hosting
55 weekday trains in both directions, and collectively carrying an average of 4,200 weekday passengers. The differences here are stark. One of the very weakest SEPTA electric railroad commuter lines was able to beat the combined ridership of SEPTA's entire intercity Budd Rail Diesel Car fleet (and the lone locomotive-hauled diesel push-pull train), and by a wide margin.
In contrast to the entire electrified Railroad Division as it was in 1978, the intercity trains were barely noticeable; let alone significant. I know that's hard for passenger-train analysts and any variety of railfans or foamers to hear, but in this case the truth is not pretty.
My personal opinions aside, it's rather amazing that the diesel intercity trains out of Reading Terminal were not permanently discontinued well before the time they historically met the axe.
Franklin Gowen • • • • READING COMPANY forum moderator
Click
here for "America's Largest Anthracite Hauler"!
In 2024, the late, great
RDG overlaps with RBM&N, SEPTA, NS, CSX, and several shortlines -
that's life . . .