• The 470 Railroad Club (Equipment and Activities)

  • Pertaining to all railroading subjects, past and present, in New England
Pertaining to all railroading subjects, past and present, in New England

Moderators: MEC407, NHN503

  by steamer69
 
Jeff Smith wrote:And I actually know where Brett is coming from about it. He can make a more clear explanation if he wants, and you all can rebut, including those from 470 who post on here.
And as I have talked to Jeff about it, because at least he will ask, here it is.....feel free to show people how these points are wrong or unfounded, and I will rescind.
The reference to "mystery Money" is kind of like calling the F-Unit rebuild Frankinengine. They have flat out LIED about their monetary situation to cover up a deal gone bad with a boiler maker Benson Mountain, who had their licenced pulled for sub-standard work. He had been contracted by the 470 to do the work on 501, and the "trustees" never did their home work on him before giving him the contract. They had David Conrad from the valley doing the inspections on the locomotive Feb 20-21 1993, and again on April 17th 2002. 470 also sent Dillan Boiler Works a request for proposal, but they never responded, not wanting to touch anything that Benson had "worked" on. They gave the contract for boiler work to Benson over reputable people who bid, because they didn't do their homework. They didn't' want to hear any of it, to the point where they have had 6 different inspectors (Jim Moore, CSRX Contractor in 1986, Gary Bensman, J. David Conrad, the FRA Inspector, and Pete Bouley). How many other steam restoration projects can you name off that need to have that many different boiler inspectors? 6? Really?
As of 2004, the 470 had spent $80,267.76 on 501, and they don't even have a cosmetic restoration done. Where did that go? Parts. Brand new Superheater tubes, Boiler Tubes, Pistons, Piston Rods, Reversing quadrants, and other parts. And then, lets not forget the $250,000.00 from the Rines family after his death. (for those of you who don't know, Matt was the project manager and club member) The club was "too good" for money that would have to be spent on the restoration of 501, and the board held such a grudge (through their own lack of knowledge and perceived stupidity) that the $250,000.00 went to Maine Narrow Gauge for their preservation work. The rest of the money that they raised for the "restoration of 501" has gone to what? They started a restoration of the locomotive in March of 1987, and it's still not done yet. They have been lying to the people who gave them money to do a project that they never intended of doing, and have taken the last 25 years to get to the point that it is at now.....not done, and rotting. It sure looks like all the people who gave them money for the purpose of restoration of that locomotive have been swindled out of their good faith contribution.
They are now doing the same thing with #4268. People in the preservation world have told them that it would be just as easy to buy a working F-unit (+/- $55,000.00 on Ozark Mountain Railcar right now) and put the B&M body on it, as what they are doing. And I agree. They are going to be spending +/- $250,000.00 on the F-Unit, but they will not finish a cosmetic restoration on the other pieces of equipment (not just 501) that they have. The other F-Unit that they have can't be run over notch 6 because it will fry the relays and shut down. It's prime mover needs a complete rebuild, and it has electrical problems that are going to necessitate every inch of wiring in the thing being redone if they keep running it.....but instead they are doing #4268.....with money that just miraculously appeared. If you go back in this thread you will see "trustees" of the club saying that they can't do anything to ANY of the equipment because of no money, when they are claiming over $240,000.00 on their tax reports (the IRS form 999 are available to the public on line). They Can't do a book that club members and railfans have been asking for, but they can pay for a new GP-9 and also get two rebuilt traction motors, the suspension bearings, gear case covers, brushes, blower motors and all the other hardware needed to install them. This all for a unit that is GOIN TO BE SCRAPPED by their own admission. Oh wait.....I'm sorry, they're going to transfer every piece of equipment (except the body and frame) to the #4268. Not to mention the paint job on the "State of Maine Car". So who is lying, and who is telling the truth. That is why I have no use for them taking good railfans money.
The whole situation above stinks, and stinks bad. And if you are wondering where I got all this information.....it is in 470 club publications to include news letters, books on their equipment (published by them) and former volunteers since the 470 doesn't have them anymore....and before you go screaming that its' just one other person.....it's not. He was not the only one to work on the engine. The 470 club lists a total of 20 people who were actively involved in the project....Not just one man. So don't even start that diversionary tactic...so they can figure out how many of them they pissed off by letting the 501 and the rest of the collection ROT. Don't believe it? Go check out their web site. Oh wait a munite....they can't even keep that going either.
  by Cosmo
 
Oh my God... BRETT!
Take a step AWAY from the hater-aide for a minute, will ya bud?

First off, please PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt how 470 "never had any intention" of restoring 501?
You can't.
Please prove me a liar in saying so. PLEASE prove to me there was never any intention to run 501...

...and why, if they never intended, did they hire Dave Conrad to inspect it?

IT JUST DON'T ADD UP SON!

Second, ANYONE can tell from the history you laid out that BOULEY and BMC are to blame for the fiasco.
MANY good people and organizations bought that man's snake oil, NOT just 470.
Other people hired the man, other people suffered.
470 was neither the first nor the last.

So much of the rest of what you say in your tirade is either your own opinion or unsubstantiated rumor.

Oh,... and I know where you get your info, and let me tell you, a FORMER BOULEY/BMC EMPLOYEE is NOT a reliable source in any way shape or form. PERIOD.
Let alone one who is covering up his OWN inclusion and involvement in the incident, Bouley/BMC not withstanding.
  by steamer69
 
Cosmo wrote:IT JUST DON'T ADD UP SON!
On that we agree.
Cosmo wrote:First off, please PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt how 470 "never had any intention" of restoring 501?
You can't.
Read the above. If they intended to restore it...it wouldn't be sitting there rotting after 25 years. Did it take you guys 25 years to do the #3025? PROVE they do want it restored. You can't. Doesn't take 25 years to at least do a cosmetic.
Cosmo wrote:...and why, if they never intended, did they hire Dave Conrad to inspect it?
Why did the city of Heartford Vermont hire Dave to do an inspection of B&M 494 when it hasn't been done? At least that is under cover.
Cosmo wrote:So much of the rest of what you say in your tirade is either your own opinion or unsubstantiated rumor.
Prove it. Put up facts like I just did to prove it.
Cosmo wrote:Oh,... and I know where you get your info, and let me tell you, a FORMER BOULEY/BMC EMPLOYEE is NOT a reliable source in any way shape or form. PERIOD.
Let alone one who is covering up his OWN inclusion and involvement in the incident, Bouley/BMC not withstanding.
What did I say Pete
Steamer69 wrote:....and before you go screaming that its' just one other person.....it's not. He was not the only one to work on the engine. The 470 club lists a total of 20 people who were actively involved in the project....Not just one man. So don't even start that diversionary tactic...
nice diversion....ball is in your court. I talk with more people than just him. There were people who machined parts, made patterns, did work on it long before he came into the picture. Put up facts like I just did, and don't make it about me.
  by Cosmo
 
steamer69 wrote:
Cosmo wrote:First off, please PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt how 470 "never had any intention" of restoring 501?
You can't.
Read the above. If they intended to restore it...it wouldn't be sitting there rotting after 25 years. Did it take you guys 25 years to do the #3025? PROVE they do want it restored. You can't. Doesn't take 25 years to at least do a cosmetic.
No, no-no-no-NO!
It only proves that they were not ABLE (for whatever reason) to complete the project, NOT in any way, shape, or form does it indicate, as you insinuate, that they had NO intention of ever restoring it.
In fact, it is clearly stated in sources that YOU have either quoted from (on other forums) or that I know you have seen that thier original intention WAS To steam 501 all along!
You have not proven against doubt beyond reasonable. And you CAN'T.
I can offer, however "reasonable doubt" to your insinuation...
In the words of Dave Conrad (quoted in the recent RR&RF article) "The countryside is littered with disassembled locomotives because of groups with good intentions..." ..how would 470 be any different?
Yet, I do not see YOU going after any of the other groups!

As for the length of time:

(From the 3713 Restoration thread, TEAM LOCOMOTIVES forum) http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopi ... 13&t=47138
"Badandy wrote:Hate to be a wet dishrag, but how long does it take to restore a locomotive.
Work on this loco started in June of 1999. It is now almost March of 2012.
That's almost 13 yrs. now since the work started. Andy"

So that's yet another project from another group that's sucking up money over time...
..yet again, you focus solely on 470 and CSRX.
Obsessed a little, are we?
steamer69 wrote:
Cosmo wrote:...and why, if they never intended, did they hire Dave Conrad to inspect it?
Why did the city of Heartford Vermont hire Dave to do an inspection of B&M 494 when it hasn't been done? At least that is under cover.
I don't know what kind of inspection Dave was asked to do, what kinds of estimates, or what his assessment was.
What I DO know is that Dave was asked to inspect 501 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING IT'S CANDIDACY FOR RESTORATION TO OPERATION.
The rest is outlined in your history above, and from what we see there one can EASILY surmise that thier intention was to STEAM 501...
..otherwise, why would they have hired BENSON MOUNTAIN to REPAIR the boiler?
In fact,.. just the fact that they DID hire a "steam boiler specialist " PROVES that their intention WAS to restore 501 TO STEAM ALL ALONG!
Cosmo wrote:So much of the rest of what you say in your tirade is either your own opinion or unsubstantiated rumor.
Prove it. Put up facts like I just did to prove it. [/quote]
Prove to all of us that it is not. They're YUR accusations and insinuations, not mine. YOU have the burden of proof as the accuser.
steamer69 wrote:
Cosmo wrote:Oh,... and I know where you get your info, and let me tell you, a FORMER BOULEY/BMC EMPLOYEE is NOT a reliable source in any way shape or form. PERIOD.
Let alone one who is covering up his OWN inclusion and involvement in the incident, Bouley/BMC not withstanding.
What did I say Pete
Steamer69 wrote:....and before you go screaming that its' just one other person.....it's not. He was not the only one to work on the engine. The 470 club lists a total of 20 people who were actively involved in the project....Not just one man. So don't even start that diversionary tactic...
...and that one man, along with his boss killed the project deader than dead. SO dead, that as you say, even after attempting to get an estimate from a reputable operation AFTER Bouley, those guys didn't want to touch it...
...and yet you blame 470 for wanting to wash their hands of the project?
Oh,.. and by the way, I HAVE talked to others who were on that project as well.
When 19 ppl say one man killed it, and ONE man says "Everybody else but me is an idiot!"...
...but we already know who you believe.
Steamer69 wrote: nice diversion....ball is in your court.
Not anymore. You're the one who's accusing 470. The burden of proof is on you. I need only provide reasonable doubt.
Steamer69 wrote:I talk with more people than just him. There were people who machined parts, made patterns, did work on it long before he came into the picture. Put up facts like I just did, and don't make it about me.
Ok,.. and just how many of those others DID you talk to? The others besides Bouley and his pet-employee-of-the-month I mean?
Did you ever sit down and have a good long talk with Dave Towle?

Bottom line...
470 had the best of intentions.. always DID.. and may or may not have always made the best decisions.
What organization, I then ask you, is PERFECT? What organization has NEVER made mistakes?
Maybe not every museum has ever been taken for a ride by Bouley, but more than one HAS. Not just 470, not just CSRX.
They are guilty of BEING swindled, NOT of intentionally swindling.

Now,... I'd like to see your proof of thier lying.
I still don't see it.
You make the accusations, and they're PRETTY STRONG ones... so let's see you PROVE "iNTENT."
  by Cosmo
 
Jeff Smith wrote:Okay, one more back and forth and lets move on from mystery money. I do hope we get a 470 response.
I agree. Let's hear from the 470.
  by steamer69
 
Cosmo wrote: I agree. Let's hear from the 470.
I agree with you and Jeff. I've been trying to get a streight answer out of them for years. You won't get one. Well 470, balls in your court. Where did all the money go for 501, and why the sudden stop without even finishing sustainment work on it. And where did all that money come from for the F-unit when you've been telling all of up that you are broke?

This is the chance to put this money issue to rest for once and for all. Where did that $240,000.00 come from that you don't have and can't be spent on your equipent that needs it.....
  by steamer69
 
Jeff Smith wrote:I do hope we get a 470 response.
Cosmo wrote:I agree. Let's hear from the 470.
steamer69 wrote:I agree with you and Jeff.
470 Railroad Club wrote:QUICK HIDE THE MONEY AGAIN AND SHUT DOWN THE WEBSITE!....What should we do?....Hide!.....
.....crickets.......crickets......2 days in, and pleading the 5th.
  by Narrowgauger
 
Jeff<
I would respectfully ask that you keep this thread open. I have listened to Brett go on and on for quite some time and quite frankly want to bury him in a foxhole at times. But for once I have to admit this old Marine wants to hear this play out once and for all. All this money to restore a dead f unit when active ones are around doesnt make any sence. I knew some of the same 470 officers from back in the 70s. And I think there must be some head scratching going on. So please dont block or stop this thread...I think the time has come for closure on all this 470/CSRX bashing. Cosmo has very good points as well as Brett.
Thanks
Narrowgauger aka Marine One
  by steamer69
 
HEY JARHEAD!!!!!! Long time my friend. Hope that all is well with you. If there was a like button I would have just hit it......
  by Narrowgauger
 
ARMY - Ain't Real Men Yet
Brett,
This really needs to come to head and now. You both make very valid points. 470 needs to answer some of them. AHHHHHH the beauty of the Internet...info at your fingertips!!!!!!

Thanks
Narrowgauger aka Marine One
  by steamer69
 
MARINE- Many Army Rejects In Navy Equipment

Battle,
Yes. Yes it does, and yes they do. This is what I've been trying to say...some people have some explaining to do. And another point. You know how easy it would be to set this all straight? All someone has to do is tell the truth....but, in this case, silence speaks volumes.... this is one of those times like we (Us knuckle draggers) would say BOHICA. Especially if you've given them money.
  by Mikejf
 
BOHICA. I haven't heard that in years. Just had a flashback.

I know of only one member of the 470 club that is any where near active on this forum. I doubt he has the capacity to speak for the group. I have not seen the other active member I know to ask some of these questions to. But his answers may be only his opinion also.
  by steamer69
 
Yes Mike, BOHICA. This is way past a SNAFU.

"I know of only one member of the 470 club that is any where near active on this forum. I doubt he has the capacity to speak for the group."

He's a Trustee, a member of the governing board. And therefore, as a member of the governing board of trustees under the doctrine of collective responsibility, the ENTIRE board is liable for the financial and other consequences of the organization's activities. Sorry to say, but there is no cop-out, or buck passing this time.

ANY member of the board of trustees has the ability to log on, post, or join and put these questions to rest.

Bueller....Bueller....Bueller....Ferris Bueller..............Bueller....Bueller.......


Crickets churping.....
  by BR4
 
As much any of us might not like it, 470 is not a government agency, or funded by taxpayer money, or accountable
to anyone except it's members. The appropriate way to hold them accountable is to become a member (if you are
not), go to the meetings, and participate in the business of the club. There seems to be a big enough following out
here that you should be able to get enough votes to make some changes. By making a specific, well thought out,
and rationally presented argument at a board meeting or general meeting, you stand a much better chance of making
headway than sitting at you keyboard slinging arrows.

Regarding the 4268: 470 owns the 501, 4266, qnd 4268; as well as the freight cars. 501 and '68 have been sitting
gathering moss for years. Better to get '68 running than do nothing at all. Operation of 501, though probably not
impossible, is not likely to happen soon, and it really isn't feasible to run it in this area. Compared to other steam
locomotives in the area, it is a large, expensive-to-run, heavy and high maintenance piece of equipment (any steam
engine is high maintenance). For CSRR, 7470 suits their needs well. 501 is much more locomotive than they need.
Operating expenses would probably (just a guess on my part) be about double that of 7470.

4268, however, although in tough shape as well, will be much less expensive to restore, and will have much more
practical value in terms of operating. With her running, they could afford to take '66 out of service for as long as
it takes to rehab her, if they had a mind to. And before some one jumps on the 6506/16 band wagon and says, (as
has been said in the past) "CSRR got rid of the sisters, now they want to run a pair of F's-how hypoctritcal,"-----
well, CSRR DID get rid of the sisters, for 2 units which are much more versatile, and have dynamic brakes. 470
did not mak that decision, just like CSRR did not decide to restore '68, 470 did. Two separate entities. If the
plan benefits both parties, so be it. Good for both of them.

As much as we all hate to admit it, not every salvagable steam engine will run again. It's a shame that any significant
piece of history can be lost. But, as we have learned in the past, time marches on and progress does too. It won't
be long before our kids are saying, "We have to save that endangered SD-90MAC, it's one of the last ones left," or
"Diesel, what's a diesel?"

Thes thoughts are put out here as food for thought. I am not trying to flame anyone, or start a war. I would hope
that everyone who reads this will take the time to consider the views that might oppose theirs and see if there
might be some logic here, even if we don't like it.
  • 1
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 34