by bruceclouette
I just came across this 2005 post by ehb:
"The shortest short line in New England was actually the Warwick Railway at .9 miles, Moshassuck Valley was a whopping 1.8, and Fore River is about 2 miles."
But here's another contender: the Van Buren Bridge Railroad in northern Maine. Although the company had over a mile of track, the portion in the US, and hence New England, was only 412 feet, or .078 miles. I would add a couple of hundred feet more on the bridge to get to the border in the middle of the river, making it about .1 mile. VB was acquired by Montreal, Maine & Atlantic as an asset of the Bangor and Aroostock. MMA uses the VB mark for its radio-control cabooses.
From the time the railroad opened in 1915, BAR had a controlling interest in the company, so in truth, it was not a short line in the sense that it had its own motive power or operated independently. There are various pictures of freight cars lettered for the VB, however, as well as the above-mentioned cabooses.
So, how's that for splitting hairs?
"The shortest short line in New England was actually the Warwick Railway at .9 miles, Moshassuck Valley was a whopping 1.8, and Fore River is about 2 miles."
But here's another contender: the Van Buren Bridge Railroad in northern Maine. Although the company had over a mile of track, the portion in the US, and hence New England, was only 412 feet, or .078 miles. I would add a couple of hundred feet more on the bridge to get to the border in the middle of the river, making it about .1 mile. VB was acquired by Montreal, Maine & Atlantic as an asset of the Bangor and Aroostock. MMA uses the VB mark for its radio-control cabooses.
From the time the railroad opened in 1915, BAR had a controlling interest in the company, so in truth, it was not a short line in the sense that it had its own motive power or operated independently. There are various pictures of freight cars lettered for the VB, however, as well as the above-mentioned cabooses.
So, how's that for splitting hairs?