25Hz wrote:So, the solution, is to move where i would be unable to really leave & do things due to inadequate service, vs transit provide adequate service. Gee, by that logic, we should just all abandon the outer counties and move to the city....! (eyeroll)
Not "all". Just
you. Also, your argument is word salad. You can't "leave & do things" in a city? That can't be what you meant.
25Hz wrote:Considering the 4 fold increase in population since the rail line was shuttered and 28 times since the interurban was shuttered, some sort of increase in services to the areas between doylestown and lower bucks is in order. To put in perspective philadelphia's population in that same time has stagnated, and gone down respectively.
Previous rates of growth don't matter nearly as much as what the density is now, especially now that we're at a new inflection point where a lot that we used to know about rates of growth is proving to be no longer true. The construction growth is in the central core, not the fringes, and VMT has been flat or declining since 2005.
Transit is about providing freedom. Specifically, the freedom to arrive at a place of your choosing, at or near a time of your choosing, with whomever you choose. Everything beyond that is implementation details. This is a map of all the places within 60 minutes, by transit and walking up to 15 minutes, of my apartment: note that it's not just about the land area colored in, but what's contained there: the people to meet, the friends to enjoy the company of, the potential jobs to work at, the businesses to patronize, the restaurants to eat at, etc.
http://www.spondee.org/noda/Francisville_isochrone.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And these are the equivalent maps for a randomly selected address in the heart of Newtown Borough, and for Langhorne Station: again, it's not just land area, but what's on the land. Langhorne does pretty well by that measure, although I suspect the algorithm is being slightly unkind to transferring at Jenkintown.
http://www.spondee.org/noda/Newtown_isochrone.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.spondee.org/noda/Langhorne_isochrone.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This sort of analysis, by the way, is why I'm against SEPTA spending its own money in places like Noble for parking garages. It does nothing to increase the freedom of transit users. It's not even a good place to park a car as a last-mile option for going outbound. If the proposal were for Willow Grove or Colmar or Warminster, then maybe I'd understand, but it's in a well-situated spot for redevelopment along 611, focused on walkability to and from the station. The stretch of 611 nearest the station is currently the location of a series of rather unfortunate parking craters. If Abington Township really wants to increase the parking capacity of Noble Station, there's plenty of existing spots in private parking lots it can lease from local businesses in a 5 minute walk from the station. Or it can rezone the area and allow private money to build a parking garage in the area, instead of or in addition to walkable TOD. I strongly suspect it has no desire to allow a garage apart from a SEPTA-subsidized one, nor would they get any takers if they did. The private sector has far better uses for its money, and so does SEPTA.
Now, before it gets buried forever, what's this about a yard track?