• PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

  by MEC407
 
The comments below this photo offer some explanations:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=350657" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
  by MEC407
 
Photo by Andrew Ordun:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=552923" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
  by GP40MC1118
 
They have arrived in Selkirk and if reports are true, they should go out on Q633 to
Rotterdam soon...

D
  by MEC407
 
gokeefe wrote:
MEC407 wrote:Photo by Andrew Ordun:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=552923" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Here comes the cavalry" .... I'll be interested to see if this new power injection helps PAS with improved time keeping.
Some fun math: the seven locomotives in that photo together weigh 2.8 million pounds. Good thing railroad bridges of that era tend to be seriously overbuilt! (By comparison, seven 286K freight cars fully loaded would be "only" 2 million pounds.)
  by GP40MC1118
 
Delivered to PAR at Rotterdam Jct tonight by CSX Q633-05 at 635PM.

D
  by newpylong
 
These are going to stay on EDRJ/Qwhatever run thru power to repay HP hours.

Almost every train that left Deerfield last 24 hours died with power issues. 2 EDPO's dead on D3, POED died, 11R died, EDBF died, BF-1 died.....the list goes on
  by jaymac
 
The "new" power might have MEC marks and Pan Am markings, but they're also 3400s, not 600s. Referencing "Here comes the cavalry," the Pony has already sent the cavalry -- the NS 3400-series loaners that helped keep not only PAS but PAR fluid -- and then retrieved that cavalry.
The numbering seems to a mere mortal civilian more than a hint that the Pony wants to keep a tight rein. Whether Power Control has orders to stifle its creativity in assigning the MEC 3400s I dunno, but -- as posted already -- it does seem predictable that there won't be many of the MEC 3400-series touring east of the Connecticut.
  by guilfordrailfan
 
jaymac wrote:The "new" power might have MEC marks and Pan Am markings, but they're also 3400s, not 600s. Referencing "Here comes the cavalry," the Pony has already sent the cavalry -- the NS 3400-series loaners that helped keep not only PAS but PAR fluid -- and then retrieved that cavalry.
The numbering seems to a mere mortal civilian more than a hint that the Pony wants to keep a tight rein. Whether Power Control has orders to stifle its creativity in assigning the MEC 3400s I dunno, but -- as posted already -- it does seem predictable that there won't be many of the MEC 3400-series touring east of the Connecticut.
These new 3400's are owned by GATX. They even have "GATX owned" in small letters on the cab just like MEC 345 and 616. The 3400 numbers were assigned by GATX and fit numerically into the GATX lease fleet. They can't be NS compatible numbers because NS already has SD40-2's of their own numbered 3400-3404 (ex Conrail). The overall consensus seems to be that they'll be assigned to 11R/14R pool service between East Deerfield and Enola, but that remains to be seen.

That said, some serious rein tightening by the Pony does seem very likely sooner than later. ;-)
  by MEC407
 
Photos by Max Linder:

http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=4337152" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=4337150" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=4337153" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=4337154" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
  by newpylong
 
guilfordrailfan wrote:
jaymac wrote:The "new" power might have MEC marks and Pan Am markings, but they're also 3400s, not 600s. Referencing "Here comes the cavalry," the Pony has already sent the cavalry -- the NS 3400-series loaners that helped keep not only PAS but PAR fluid -- and then retrieved that cavalry.
The numbering seems to a mere mortal civilian more than a hint that the Pony wants to keep a tight rein. Whether Power Control has orders to stifle its creativity in assigning the MEC 3400s I dunno, but -- as posted already -- it does seem predictable that there won't be many of the MEC 3400-series touring east of the Connecticut.
These new 3400's are owned by GATX. They even have "GATX owned" in small letters on the cab just like MEC 345 and 616. The 3400 numbers were assigned by GATX and fit numerically into the GATX lease fleet. They can't be NS compatible numbers because NS already has SD40-2's of their own numbered 3400-3404 (ex Conrail). The overall consensus seems to be that they'll be assigned to 11R/14R pool service between East Deerfield and Enola, but that remains to be seen.

That said, some serious rein tightening by the Pony does seem very likely sooner than later. ;-)
By newpylong » November 5th, 2015, 11:41 pm
These are going to stay on EDRJ/Qwhatever run thru power to repay HP hours
  by MEC407
 
Have the 3400s been placed in service?
  by guilfordrailfan
 
MEC407 wrote:Have the 3400s been placed in service?
Three of the five were in service as of yesterday.
3400 on EDAY
3401 and 3404 on EDRJ
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 35