by bspinelli
This was in the latest "Mobilizing the Region" from TSTC. Is there an "official" version of this plan or map anywhere? Should be built by what....2054? 2104?
Warrington Unveils Extended Bergen County Rail Systemhttp://www.tstc.org/bulletin/20041018/mtr47703.html
NJ Transit director George Warrington presented a new northern NJ rail plan to the Bergen transportation summit last Tuesday. Its most interesting feature is the connection of new light rail lines to the new cross-Hudson passenger rail tunnel NJ Transit is planning. That would mean direct light rail access to Manhattan. The new projects Warrington identified were a two-branch diesel light rail system and a spur of the electric Hudson-Bergen light rail to the Xanadu/Giants Stadium site. These would be added to the new cross-Hudson tunnel, a rail loop around Secaucus that NJ Transit has developed as part of the tunnel project to give the Pascack and Bergen-Main lines direct access to Manhattan and the pending Xanadu commuter rail connection from NJ Transit’s Pascack Valley Line
The diesel light rail lines would run from Hawthorne to Hackensack on the NY Susquehanna & Western freight line and on the Northern Branch freight line from Tenafly to Tonnelle Avenue in North Bergen. The Hawthorne Line would join the Tenafly line at a rail junction further north in North Bergen. Tonnelle Avenue would become a major rail crossroads where riders could switch between the diesel and electric light rail lines. From that junction, a rider could take light rail to Xanadu, points north, the Hoboken-Jersey City waterfront business districts or Manhattan. At least part of the funding for these lines would be obtained by saving $1 billion currently allocated to extend the Hudson-Bergen electric line to Tenafly. The diesel light rail option saves money by eliminating big electrical infrastructure needs. Some kind of hybrid diesel-electric light rail vehicle would be needed to allow trains on the diesel lines to enter Penn Station or a new underground Manhattan station constructed along with the new rail tunnel.
Warrington said Bergen County had a high percentage of commuters to Manhattan, but compared to other nearby NJ counties, the proportion of its commuters using trains was low. He predicted strong ridership if the plan is realized.
Warrington’s plan has a number of political advantages. First, the Hawthorne branch incorporates a long-held Bergen County ambition for a rail line that can serve trips within the county. It also may win Passaic County’s support. Second, it ties transit plans for the northern NJ counties to the need for the new rail tunnel to Manhattan. If Transit can show that project as the linchpin for most New Jersey rail expansion aspirations, it improves its ability to win the big funding the tunnel requires.
The plan also raises several questions. Among them: Will the new Manhattan tunnel in fact have the capacity to accommodate higher ridership on existing lines as well as new services from areas as far-flung as Ocean and Passaic Counties? Does the plan to loop the Bergen County commuter rail lines around Secaucus make the expensive new station there obsolete within a generation? Can the timing, phasing and funding for the complex plan play out in a way that keeps constituencies for its various parts content over the long period it will take to implement?