[DISCLAIMER: I'm typing this as I listen/watch so there probably are errors and is by no means complete.] Here are my "notes": If they were to win in court, it would then be remanded to the STB. The "mandatory mediation" meeting was "not fruitful". The town has asked the court for a "stay" to stop further work on the project. There has been no ruling on this so until that time, the G&U is free to continue construction. At least one resident asked about a "plan B" to assist residents in the area in possible relocation etc. The selectmen freely state that they have an "uphill battle". One resident brought up the subject of liability insurance coverage by the G&U for the facility. One resident claimed that there was a "rumor" that the facility will or already has been sold to an outside entity. The selectmen believe that this would nullify preemption if it were true. There is a proposal for another informational meeting for the citizens in the future (early January?) at a larger venue. One citizen wants the parents of children in the North Grafton Elementary School to be notified of the "potential danger" or an "evacuation plan". One selectman advises that residents hire "counsel" to draft a brief about property valuation impacts. There was further discussion about forming an evacuation plan. One resident asked if the property could be taken by "eminent domain" The selectmen indicated that that was not viable. One resident asked if the property could be purchased by the town. Q&A ended ~2135 EST. ¹IMHO, the gist of this seems to be that it's not looking good for their case. Gawd, I wish I'd learned how to touch-type.
¹ Statement of opinion.
Seen behind the motorman on the inside wall of a PCC departing "Riverside" many years ago: "Pickpockets are on duty for your convenience."