NJT4115 wrote:If the Gladstone line has only four MidTOWN Direct trains and the rest are aging Arrow IIIs, whats the point of keeping the Gladstone electrified?
Why wouldn't you keep it electrified? MU's are quick and suited perfectly to the short distance between station running that the Gladstone and M&E lines have. Electric running is quieter and more popular with the surrounding towns.
NJT4115 wrote:Electricity is getting expensive and is not getting cheaper so why not remove the catenaries? It would cost NJ Transit less.
How do you figure diesel powered trains cost less? What factual information do you have to support this claim? Electricity is not getting more expensive. It is keeping up with the current rate of inflation. Have you noticed the price of gas lately? Seen those diesel pumps? The price of diesel is well above gasoline right now. Idling electric trains cost far less than idling diesel trains. Each diesel engine has two fuel consumers, the prime mover and the HEP power plant. There is absolutely no reason to remove a perfectly functioning system such as the catenary system.
NJT4115 wrote:The Gladstone is one of the shortest NJT lines. The trains could fuel at Hoboken, thus no need for fueling centers on the line.
Where on the entire transit system do you see online fueling centers? Trains are generally fueled once a day depending on their cycle. The Gladstone is not one of the shortest NJT lines when you consider you have to ride 20 miles on the M&E to get to the Gladstone Branch. I am not quite sure where all of your facts came from but you don't really have any correct information here.
There is a reason that NJT electrified part of the Boonton Line. There is a reason NJT is spending all kinds of money on dual mode engines. Those engines will be powered from the catenary whenever possible. Electric power is just a far better way to power a railroad.