by F-line to Dudley via Park
Town of Falmouth owns from Falmouth Depot to Woods Hole, purchasing it direct from Conrail in 1977. That was the earliest rail-to-trails job in all of New England, so unfortunately it wasn't done at a time when there was any legal means of keeping the railroad charter intact. It pre-dates federal landbanking laws ('86), pre-dates the state's buy of all other Cape lines from Conrail ('79-82), and was not included in the mass bankruptcy sale of Penn Central assets to the state ('73) that slapped a court-negotiated 'proto-landbanking' status on all the inactive acquisitions because this branch was simply too far afield to lump inside the expanded MBTA district borders with the others.
North Falmouth-Falmouth Depot is a cookie-cutter MassDOT-owned landbank with a revokable trail lease. The Turkington legislation forced MassDOT to rip out the rail hardware against their will, but did not impose any legal boobytraps on the trail's status because that would've been illegal under all that fed- and owner-preemption legalese. We're dealing with rote-standard rail trail & rail-with-trail legalese here, unlike Depot-WH. Treat the halves as entirely different pieces because the legalities that created those trails are so divergently different in time and place.
It's important to note that when they talk rail restoration, Falmouth Depot is the one that truly matters because it sits right next door to the huge Steamship Authority parking lot and the CCRTA + intercity bus depot. There's extremely little parking at Woods Hole-proper, and not even much in the way of a kiss-and-ride capacity. The Steamship Authority requires that you transfer to the shuttle buses to get there at all, because the ferry terminal lot is strictly for cars being loaded/unloaded onto the ferries (and they barely even have the space to do that with much efficiency). All other parking lots in the neighborhood are strictly rationed to USCG and Oceanographic Institute employees first, leaving very little share leftover for the hordes of visitors. It's mostly on-street parking in the neighborhood. They graded out a stretch of RR yard a couple years ago with 100+ spaces of linear parking along the bikeway, but it's got this horrible narrow little half-mile driveway totally inadequate to task.
Because you are more or less required to take the Steamship Authority shuttle to get there in the first place, Woods Hole-proper already has a transit share about as high as it's ever going to get. The only way to cram more people there is to run more shuttles. Direct rail would obviously be better, but it doesn't take people out of cars because the cars are already being diverted at Falmouth Depot. It's simply a replacement for much of the shuttle buses. Falmouth Depot is where the carpocalypse truly is, and where the car share is melting down the area's overall functioning from lack of other options. The Steamship Authority lot is massively overcongested. It's a mile south of where the MA 28 expressway dumps all traffic onto a 2-lane downtown main street, causing backups for miles. Falmouth engaged in some stupid parking-centric big box development over the last few decades so the shopping centers and big condo complexes ringing the east end of downtown tend to be car-centric hellholes. And the bus depot is hitting far below its weight because all this congestion on downtown streets limits the achievable frequencies of connecting service from Bourne/mainland or Hyannis.
So in terms of where direct rail addresses the most number of problems most effectively, Falmouth Depot has always been #1 with a bullet. It's everything you'd want as a transit node anchoring a dense area with diverse trip catchments, and the local roads are in no way shape or form built to handle the load. Woods Hole is gravy, but it's functionally extracurricular because the transit share covering the last-mile problem is already fixed-by-fiat by the Steamship Authority mandating that all Pn'R visitors must transfer to shuttle bus at Falmouth Depot. So I wouldn't get too caught up about wouldas-couldas-shouldas on the 1977 section of town-owned trail because that's not where the real paydirt is for creating/diverting new transit trips. The place where 80%+ of that upside exists does have the cookie-cutter MassDOT landbank lease. The travesty of the Turkington action is just how tailor-made the Steamship Authority lot and revamped bus depot are for direct rail in their own right...not so much how that bill made the always-impractical Woods Hole restoration a degree further removed from reality.
North Falmouth-Falmouth Depot is a cookie-cutter MassDOT-owned landbank with a revokable trail lease. The Turkington legislation forced MassDOT to rip out the rail hardware against their will, but did not impose any legal boobytraps on the trail's status because that would've been illegal under all that fed- and owner-preemption legalese. We're dealing with rote-standard rail trail & rail-with-trail legalese here, unlike Depot-WH. Treat the halves as entirely different pieces because the legalities that created those trails are so divergently different in time and place.
It's important to note that when they talk rail restoration, Falmouth Depot is the one that truly matters because it sits right next door to the huge Steamship Authority parking lot and the CCRTA + intercity bus depot. There's extremely little parking at Woods Hole-proper, and not even much in the way of a kiss-and-ride capacity. The Steamship Authority requires that you transfer to the shuttle buses to get there at all, because the ferry terminal lot is strictly for cars being loaded/unloaded onto the ferries (and they barely even have the space to do that with much efficiency). All other parking lots in the neighborhood are strictly rationed to USCG and Oceanographic Institute employees first, leaving very little share leftover for the hordes of visitors. It's mostly on-street parking in the neighborhood. They graded out a stretch of RR yard a couple years ago with 100+ spaces of linear parking along the bikeway, but it's got this horrible narrow little half-mile driveway totally inadequate to task.
Because you are more or less required to take the Steamship Authority shuttle to get there in the first place, Woods Hole-proper already has a transit share about as high as it's ever going to get. The only way to cram more people there is to run more shuttles. Direct rail would obviously be better, but it doesn't take people out of cars because the cars are already being diverted at Falmouth Depot. It's simply a replacement for much of the shuttle buses. Falmouth Depot is where the carpocalypse truly is, and where the car share is melting down the area's overall functioning from lack of other options. The Steamship Authority lot is massively overcongested. It's a mile south of where the MA 28 expressway dumps all traffic onto a 2-lane downtown main street, causing backups for miles. Falmouth engaged in some stupid parking-centric big box development over the last few decades so the shopping centers and big condo complexes ringing the east end of downtown tend to be car-centric hellholes. And the bus depot is hitting far below its weight because all this congestion on downtown streets limits the achievable frequencies of connecting service from Bourne/mainland or Hyannis.
So in terms of where direct rail addresses the most number of problems most effectively, Falmouth Depot has always been #1 with a bullet. It's everything you'd want as a transit node anchoring a dense area with diverse trip catchments, and the local roads are in no way shape or form built to handle the load. Woods Hole is gravy, but it's functionally extracurricular because the transit share covering the last-mile problem is already fixed-by-fiat by the Steamship Authority mandating that all Pn'R visitors must transfer to shuttle bus at Falmouth Depot. So I wouldn't get too caught up about wouldas-couldas-shouldas on the 1977 section of town-owned trail because that's not where the real paydirt is for creating/diverting new transit trips. The place where 80%+ of that upside exists does have the cookie-cutter MassDOT landbank lease. The travesty of the Turkington action is just how tailor-made the Steamship Authority lot and revamped bus depot are for direct rail in their own right...not so much how that bill made the always-impractical Woods Hole restoration a degree further removed from reality.