Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
west point wrote:Although Amtrak is not know for logical assignments. Until all new diners are delivered and for some time afterward . Take the best ones and have them on reserve at NYP, MIA, CHI, & New Orleans, & maybe WASH. That way if one or more of the V-2 diners have too many teething problems at one of the locations a Heritage can be substituted.A good idea.
jhdeasy wrote:During the past few years, I've heard some senior Amtrak officials sayAre they senior enough that they might retire or otherwise move their resumes in the near future?
jp1822 wrote:Some would make for nice lounge cars south of DC, west of Harrisburg, west/north of Albany, north of New Haven. Amtrak could add a fee if the lounge is nice enough. Amtrak restored two Heritage sleepers for the business fleet! Just saying "some" diners could make a special appearance on some routes......if a daily Cardinal starts - lots of cramped up space during its two day run! But vision and logic often don't go hand in hand with a cost benefit analysis - cost to maintain over revenue it could attract......Gawd no. Let someone else take the costs associated with these decades old cars and try to keep them running.
Greg Moore wrote:Like what VIA Rail Canada has done? Look at the transformation of so e of their 55+ equipment and prices they rake in for it! Not saying Amtrak could do same, but a few of the best for less money and re-design to a lounge? Who'd a thunk a Viewliner sleeper prototype that was in ruins would be wondering around as a "theater car."jp1822 wrote:Some would make for nice lounge cars south of DC, west of Harrisburg, west/north of Albany, north of New Haven. Amtrak could add a fee if the lounge is nice enough. Amtrak restored two Heritage sleepers for the business fleet! Just saying "some" diners could make a special appearance on some routes......if a daily Cardinal starts - lots of cramped up space during its two day run! But vision and logic often don't go hand in hand with a cost benefit analysis - cost to maintain over revenue it could attract......Gawd no. Let someone else take the costs associated with these decades old cars and try to keep them running.
Matt Johnson wrote:I think it's safe to say that soon the only Heritage equipment running in Amtrak service will be on the North Carolina Piedmont service.That's not even capital-"H" Heritage equipment, as it's all NC's problem to maintain their cars. The only actual Heritage-roster equipment that will still be under Beech Grove's jurisdiction after the bags and diners are dispersed are the Pacific Parlour cars. At least until the Superliner III order bakes in some new lounges and forces the inevitable "You want us to run antiques on your route; YOU maintain them" decision putting the squeeze on the Coast Starlight states to pay up or shut up.
Tadman wrote:THere's a big difference between this fleet and VIa's fleet. This fleet is 22 cars of varied background and varied rebuilding regimen that has been run on grueling day-in, day-out service on select NYP-based trains. The Via fleet comes from a homogeneous background (IE parts are all the same) and basically serves two trains which run every third day.Though that run every third day is across the country and back.
Long story short, Via's parts department has to stock a lot less for a fleet that is used much more gently.