• Amtrak Gateway Tunnels

  • This forum will be for issues that don't belong specifically to one NYC area transit agency, but several. For instance, intra-MTA proposals or MTA-wide issues, which may involve both Metro-North Railroad (MNRR) and the Long Island Railroad (LIRR). Other intra-agency examples: through running such as the now discontinued MNRR-NJT Meadowlands special. Topics which only concern one operating agency should remain in their respective forums.
This forum will be for issues that don't belong specifically to one NYC area transit agency, but several. For instance, intra-MTA proposals or MTA-wide issues, which may involve both Metro-North Railroad (MNRR) and the Long Island Railroad (LIRR). Other intra-agency examples: through running such as the now discontinued MNRR-NJT Meadowlands special. Topics which only concern one operating agency should remain in their respective forums.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, FL9AC, Jeff Smith

  by bdawe
 
There's been money invested in the region. It ends up being some of the world's most expensive subways, commuter tunnels,and attached malls.

It seems New York needs something other than money
  by Ridgefielder
 
Safetee wrote:My gut feeling is that something has to give. I think that Amtrak could easily send it's Empire trains to Grand Central but that wont relieve too much pressure. No question that Penn is the NEC bridge between Boston and Washington so Amtrak corridor traffic has to be protected. Long island RR has no where else to go so they're staying. NJT is the elephant in the room. Maybe the best cheapest alternative is to put some if not all of those Jersey commuters back on the boats.
GCT is pretty much at capacity with MNRR, particularly at rush hour. And as you say, the Empire Service isn't the issue.

The problem with putting the Jersey commuters "back on the boats" is that the Manhattan office center-of-gravity has shifted since the heyday of the Hudson commuter ferries back before WW2, when the CNJ, PRR, Erie, DL&W and NYC-West Shore ran their own "navies" out of their terminals in Jersey City, Hoboken and Weehawken. In those days the majority of office space was below Chambers St., in the area we now call the Financial District. There were some secondary pockets around Union Square and in the Times Square area, and in the blocks surrounding Grand Central, but most commuters were heading to Lower Manhattan. And if you look at the map you'll see that because the island narrows substantially south of Canal Street most of the Financial District is at most a 20 minute walk from the North River ferry slips.

That changed substantially from the 1960's on, to the point that today the bulk of Manhattan office space is in Midtown, in the area that stretches between 8th Ave. and 2nd Ave from 34th St on the south to 59th St on the north. That makes the ferries a much more difficult proposition. From my office on 42nd & 5th for instance it's at least a 30 minute walk to the West Side ferry terminal at Pier 78. The crosstown bus can take even longer because of the traffic.
Greg Moore wrote:BTW, to give you an idea on a bridge. I believe the Coast Guard requires on the Hudson up to Albany 110' clearance. Or you need a lift or swing or something. That's a non-starter given the amount of boat vs train traffic.

So, even at a 2% grade, 110' clearance, well I'll let you do the math.
And the Pennsylvania Railroad did the math way back in the 1890's. And that's why they threw out Gustav Lindenthal's plans for the North River Bridge and built the tunnels instead.
  by bostontrainguy
 
Yet they built the Hell Gate on the other side at 135' clearance.
  by andrewjw
 
bostontrainguy wrote:Yet they built the Hell Gate on the other side at 135' clearance.
At the time, that area was much cheaper to buy than Manhattan. Both have only risen in cost, and Manhattan to an extreme degree. Also, they had a much longer 'landing strip' in Queens than they would have in Manhattan.
  by Ridgefielder
 
bostontrainguy wrote:Yet they built the Hell Gate on the other side at 135' clearance.

In 1912 when they started work on the Hell Gate the land on the Queens side was pretty well empty. Northern Queens didn't really start to get built up until after the IRT Astoria and Flushing lines opened in 1917. And on the Bronx side the Hell Gate approach runs parallel to the shore through what was then and is to this day a neighborhood of factories and railroad yards. It's totally different from the environment a bridge builder would confront on the West Side of Manhattan-- either today or in 1890.
  by johndmuller
 
Our politics have now become so toxic now that it probably doesn't matter how risky it is to procrastinate building these tunnels or how they might cost $XYZ$ - regarding which no one can really make a cost/benefit analysis anyway because the downside of not having the tunnels at all (or even just having only one tube) is so high as to make even 2 times $XYZ$ seem cheap and the cost of screwing up millions of people's jobs/lives and hundreds of companies and their workers (not to mention secondary, tertiary, etc. effects) can only approximately be measured anyway.

This p_ssing contest over whether and/or who pays what and when is totally irresponsible on the part of everyone who is involved and needs to STOP; and this should be clear no matter which side of the proverbial fence one is on.

Its the same with a lot of other contentious issues going on now; too many people in power seem to think that it is more important to be seen as getting their personal way than to do the right thing - or even sometimes to do what they might consider to be the wrong thing, just to keep the country moving along at peace with itself. It doesn't have to be this hard. Wise up.
  by bostontrainguy
 
Dick H wrote:From The Hill. Trump personally wants Gateway Tunnel dumped.
http://thehill.com/policy/transportatio ... ect-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maybe pushing back against Shumer a bit trying to get some cabinet nominees? Politics . . . the art of the deal.
  by R&DB
 
I guess none of the Trump employees in Manhattan live in New Jersey?
  by Safetee
 
these days really rich people rarely if ever would consider taking mass transit and trains. so why in heavens' name would anybody waste 32 billion dollars on a project that will mainly benefit undesirables from new jersey?
  by rr503
 
bostontrainguy wrote:
Dick H wrote:From The Hill. Trump personally wants Gateway Tunnel dumped.
http://thehill.com/policy/transportatio ... ect-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maybe pushing back against Shumer a bit trying to get some cabinet nominees? Politics . . . the art of the deal.
Nope. Punishing us for not voting for him. Sad that the 'businessman' can't see the fact that 20% of our national GDP comes from the cities dependent on the NEC.
  by bdawe
 
I dunno, it could be that it's just an absurdly overpriced project?
  by mtuandrew
 
bdawe wrote:I dunno, it could be that it's just an absurdly overpriced project?
This is a man that wants $xxx billion for a glorified garden fence. Gateway is probably overpriced, but this is a personal vendetta.
  by sullysullinburg
 
Is there any sort of plan in place should the current tunnels become unusable? Clearly the plan is to build new tunnels but let’s say tomorrow the current tunnels are declared “Unfit for duty” or God Forbbid, one or both of the collapses. What would NJT/Amtrak do roll new ones could be built or the old ones repaired?
  by JamesRR
 
sullysullinburg wrote:Is there any sort of plan in place should the current tunnels become unusable? Clearly the plan is to build new tunnels but let’s say tomorrow the current tunnels are declared “Unfit for duty” or God Forbbid, one or both of the collapses. What would NJT/Amtrak do roll new ones could be built or the old ones repaired?
We use one tunnel and service is drastically cut. Many busses added at transit points. More ferries.
And a lot of people begin working from home.
  • 1
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 156