by waldwickrailfan
if it survived than this forum will be the Erie-Lackawanna Rail istead of NJT. and we would also see all EL colors.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: blockline4180
airman00 wrote:Why did the state (NJDOT) not like E-L using u34ch loco's for freight service on weekends? Was it so they don't burn out the passenger engine fleet? What else could they have used? (or what did the state want?) A switcher? They had a few of those. Or a geep?Simple, would you like engines you bought for passenger service getting stuck in Binghamton or Chicago on a Monday when it should be working commuter trains?
Kaback9 wrote:I agree with that, but was the E-L power starved or did they not have enough work engines?airman00 wrote:Why did the state (NJDOT) not like E-L using u34ch loco's for freight service on weekends? Was it so they don't burn out the passenger engine fleet? What else could they have used? (or what did the state want?) A switcher? They had a few of those. Or a geep?Simple, would you like engines you bought for passenger service getting stuck in Binghamton or Chicago on a Monday when it should be working commuter trains?
gearhead wrote:Does not the death of the Rock Island have to do something with the death of the Erie? In that UP/BN/SF/CNW moved there overhead traffic to other railroads? The lack of a freindly connection to other railroads?The Rock Island was around for 4 years after the EL ceased to exist. RI was shut down in March, 1980.
tjdean wrote:Agreed. EL's biggest interchange partner at Chicago as ATSF... from the merger in 1960 to the last day of operations in 1976. The Rock Island had very little to do with the relationship between EL and ATSF.gearhead wrote:Does not the death of the Rock Island have to do something with the death of the Erie? In that UP/BN/SF/CNW moved there overhead traffic to other railroads? The lack of a freindly connection to other railroads?The Rock Island was around for 4 years after the EL ceased to exist. RI was shut down in March, 1980.