Railroad Forums 

  • Washington Union Station

  • General discussion about railroad operations, related facilities, maps, and other resources.
General discussion about railroad operations, related facilities, maps, and other resources.

Moderator: Robert Paniagua

 #242193  by M&Eman
 
When the PRR/B&O constructed the upper level, low level platforms were built? Wasn't the PRR standard of the time high-level platforms at all major terminals and all new constructs? When PC converted the platforms from low to high when the Metroliners were delivered, how come a few were left low-level? Did the PRR and B&O ever use the lower level?

 #242319  by BaltOhio
 
When Union Station was built (opened c.1906 as I recall), low-level platforms were the standard -- e.g., Broad St. Station (no 30th St. then), Jersey City, Wilmington (1903?), Baltimore (1911), etc. (North Phila. got high-level platforms when the track grade was raised, but didn't have them originally.) High level platforms were installed in Washington, as you say, when the Metroliner project was started and were confined strictly to tracks used by the Metroliners and other NEC trains.

Traditionally, specific track areas were assigned to B&O, PRR, and the southern lines -- B&O at the west side, PRR in the center, and, of course, southern lines on the low-level tracks at the east end. There were overlaps, especially in high-traffic periods, but generally each road had its own assigned tracks. PRR trains did use the lower level tracks when necessary for whatever reason, but I don't recall any B&O trains doing so.

The old B&O-PRR separation pretty much continues to this day, withMARC Camden and Brunswick-Martinsburg trains using the westerly tracks.

 #242555  by M&Eman
 
Wasn't Park St. (Newark) high-level?

 #242729  by BaltOhio
 
Not sure what you mean by Park St. in Newark. Wasn't that the original H&M terminal? If so, it naturally would have had high-level platforms to be compatible with the H&M cars.