Woody wrote:R&DB wrote: ... why just Roanoke and Bristol? This route should be extended to New Orleans via Knoxville, Chattanooga, Birmingham, Montgomery and Mobile.
Short answer: no money, no equipment.
But of course this route should happen. However, only Virginia has a good track record for getting new or revived service in place. That doesn't mean, "Never gonna happen, abandon hope". It means it will be done step by step over some years, so be very patient.
How many years is some? I don't know how old you are Woody but I'm in my 40's and I highly doubt I'll see it in my lifetime considering Amtrak predates me and I have hardly seen much progress in my lifetime.
I think the chances of any national funded services along this route are slim and I hope other 750+ mile routes would have priority (Gulf Coast, Crescent Star, service through Vegas, and oh yeah that other one). So for federally funding of the route you suggest, I'm not saying it's not a useful route but back of the line.
As for Tennessee funding this route, I think the key is getting the Lynchburg (would they rename it Roanoke?) extended to Bristol and hopefully the Tennessee people in the Tri-Cities area are driving across the border to Virginia to ride the train to DC and beyond and saying to their government this is a good idea why not extend it the other direction?
On the other hand, Memphis already has pretty decent rail service to Chicago and New Orleans already (virtually red eye schedule between CHI). You would think Memphis residents would push for more rail service to other nearby locations (Nashville would seem like an obvious choice). Either they're not or they are and it's falling on deaf ears. Nashville has no Amtrak at all and hasn't since the Floridian died. It's hard for them to want Amtrak when they're nowhere near an Amtrak station. I entered Nashville in Amtrak's "Find a station by location" and they said there are no Amtrak stations within 150 miles (the largest option I could choose).