BlockLine_4111 wrote:These are two parallel, competing lines, in close proximity to one another.
The West Shore also is a parallel competing line to the PVL.
Given the mega freight density of the West Shore and that it is not of Erie heritage naturally the Northern Valley would get the go-ahead to restore commuter service.
These are not "competing lines". The PVL, West Shore and Northern do not serve the same municipalities—only if they did would they be "competing lines" per se. NJ Transit is not in competition with itself; it is there to run a service. The PVL does not serve Teaneck, Bergenfield, Dumont, Harrington Park; nor does the Northern Branch (just as on the same token the WS does not serve Leonia, Englewood, Tenafly et al). Just to note—in the past, the old CNJ and Reading lines in NJ (which would consist of the RVL and West Trenton line today) used to be considered a "competing" line to the NEC—but in modern terms, that is no longer accurate.
Mick D wrote:I don't see direct WS sevice into Hoboken happening. There would have to be a connection built to BC/ML through Croxton now that HBLR will be running on old NJ Connecting Railroad
The Bergen Arches are lying idle. Plenty of room to widen either the Northern Branch or the NYSW between there and North Bergen. To route pax service via Secaucus would be the gravest error at this point, given the current conditions at Secaucus.