scharnhorst wrote:But I can see what your getting at.
I don't, unless your saying that HELM is financed through local/state government?
scharnhorst wrote:yes true but when the lettering system came about for Helm Leaseing that was how they set up there rostor with diffrent letting i.d.ing what locomotives were assigned to where. I'll have to see if I can find that info and post it.
Do you know this as fact, or are you meerly presuming? It is the most sensible explanation as to why they have so many reporting marks.
As I quickly skimmed through the roster scharnhorst posted, I counted 7 different marks for Helm: HL, HLC, HLCX, HATX, HLGX, HLLX, and HLMX. Thats quite a few marks for one company! Other things I got out of that roster.
HLGX appears to be used exclusively for GE locomotives, but not every GE gets HLGX marks.
HLLX seems to be mostly switchers and smaller locomotives (GP38's) the exception is a block of 6 ex DEEX SD40's.
HLMX appears only once on the roster, for 6 ex-CN SD50F's, maybe for full cowl units?
Units definately arnt assigned marks based on where they came from. The three ex-MEC GP38's on the Helm roster are HLCX not HATX.