Hi Button,
Point well taken. However, most of the passengers got off the train at Phillie. Lots of commuters worked in Manhattan and lived in the Phillie area. So for those continuing south, or even those boarding in Phillie and heading south, they had a choice. It should also be borne in mind that at one time the PRR also did not have those Hudson River Tunnels to use. Then it reallly was a moot question.
You did start me thinking, however. The B & O had easy access to Staten Island. Did they ever have passenger trains come and go from the stations in Staten Island now served by SIRT ??? It would be more advantages to take the Staten Island Ferry from Brooklyn to a station instead of fighting all that traffic in Manhattan. After that point, would it have been a better idea solely on the basis of the meals served on each RR ? Would the service on the B & O have been that much better ?
Point well taken. However, most of the passengers got off the train at Phillie. Lots of commuters worked in Manhattan and lived in the Phillie area. So for those continuing south, or even those boarding in Phillie and heading south, they had a choice. It should also be borne in mind that at one time the PRR also did not have those Hudson River Tunnels to use. Then it reallly was a moot question.
You did start me thinking, however. The B & O had easy access to Staten Island. Did they ever have passenger trains come and go from the stations in Staten Island now served by SIRT ??? It would be more advantages to take the Staten Island Ferry from Brooklyn to a station instead of fighting all that traffic in Manhattan. After that point, would it have been a better idea solely on the basis of the meals served on each RR ? Would the service on the B & O have been that much better ?