Technology already exists that can "read" a person's responses while driving and make audible sounds or vibrate the steering wheel if it thinks the driver is falling asleep. Perhaps the rail equivalent would be relatively low cost, compared to a catastrophic event. It could read the facial movements and position of the engineers head and shoulders, their arm movements, and pressure applied to the throttle/break, pass the data through an algorithm, and determine if it is consistent with someone falling asleep. It could then emit loud beeps that sound different from anything current systems produce, and/or vibrate the seat in a way that is not pleasant. If the engineer fails to acknowledge the beeps or vibrations, emergency brakes applied.
8th Notch wrote:I'm wondering if the NTSB will go back over previous trips to see how he normally ran approaching the terminal. I'm willing to bet inward facing cameras will be one of the many recommendations from the NTSB.The NTSB can make the recommendation ... then wait for the next accident to complain that their recommendation has not been followed (and repeat for the next 40 years). Congress can pass a law and the FRA can write regulations. The NTSB can only recommend - and fight a PR battle when their recommendations are not followed. ("I told you so.")
mmi16 wrote:As agenda driven as the NTSB has become, I have no fear that inward facing cameras will be among their recommendations. That being said - how would a inward facing camera have PREVENTED this incident. NTSB recommendations need to be about PREVENTING accidents from happening in the future, not doing their investigative work for them.I suppose they could complain that the railroads were not properly supervising their employees. Single operator cabs where there isn't even a conductor present to make sure that the engineer is doing their job. Two person cabs where the employees cover for each other. The claim could be that better supervision would prevent accidents ... and even if the claim isn't 100% logical the claim can be made.
The camera would be a deterrent to any bad behavior. Without any proof of bad behavior (phoning, texting, reading, unauthorized people in the cab, etc) there would be nothing to deter.