sullysullinburg wrote:Any word yet on equipment and what a “normal train” would look like?
Probably not much different than the average SLE consist. How many cars depends on what percentage of the fleet needs to be split amongst SLE and NHHS, which is entirely dependent on when M8's get the greenlight on SLE. The diesel fleet will be split between lines for awhile until the supplemental M8 order comes in, as it's unlikely there'll be enough EMU's to pry away now for covering more than the Old Saybrook runs...with New London remaining diesel for time being and OSB occasionally being supplemented at peak with diesel sets. That said, there's more Mafersas than SLE truly needs so they're not looking at any sort of shortage for the limited Year 1 schedule on the Hartford Line. It's more a matter of whether the locos under rebuild get back from the program in-time.
njt/mnrrbuff wrote:I can imagine the Mafersa cars currently used on SLE. Down the road, ConnDot wants to buy brand new equipment for the Ctrails service, which is a great idea, as the Mafersa cars and motive power used on SLE trains is aging.
MNRR's East-of-Hudson bi-level procurement may serve up this opportunity, as the MTA is going to be replacing all Shoreliner I/II/III/IV's and Comet II's on the Hudson and Harlem Lines with MLV-clone bi's in one fell swoop with the LIRR C3-replacement order. CDOT will have its normal seat at the table to participate in that order, but since Danbury/Waterbury/NHHS all have little to gain from going taller and packing the seating denser the state may find better economy of scale pulling a lateral ownership swap for all of the MTA's Shoreliner IV's and a large number of the Shoreliner III's to put through a light midlife overhaul. While junking all of the CT-owned Shoreliner I/II's and the rebuild-age Mafersas. That would give CDOT a full common coach fleet all equipped with center-door boarding and ability to run thru to GCT (which the Mafersas cannot because the carbody undercarriage doesn't have adequate third rail clearance). Since there's way too many III's/IV's (117 active cars) for CDOT's needs some judicious scrappings of rougher-condition surplus III's to supply the rebuild program can help lower the costs a bit more. They'll still likely have dozens more than they know what to do with, enough to bank for lots of frequency expansion on Hartford + Danbury/Waterbury and maybe even for taking MassDOT's money to run the Conn River Line commuter rail as a seamless Hartford Line HFD-SPG-Greenfield routing flavor.
As long as they get the III/IV fleet up to uniform state-of-repair and get rid of all their rapidly-decaying I's/II's and the unlike Mafersas it's good economy-of-scale and the relatively light wear these CT routes would put on the rebuilt cars ought to make them last pretty long on only a moderate refresh.