The presentation link is for a Power Point Presentation. I was able to open it without a problem.
Railroad Forums
sery2831 wrote:Not sure what you mean by fixing the Brattle Loop. There is not a true demand for it's use(even with the GLX) because it really does not allow a connection to Downtown. And since it will always be one track in each direction to Park Street, double tracking Gov't Center will not help either.It should be used as a terminus for the GLX to Tufts.
The EGE wrote:Turning GLX trains at Government Center would be a very stupid idea indeed. No one wants to transfer to get to Park Street.I wonder if it would be possible to have the westbound track be capable of having a switch onto the pocket at Park, pulling up along the eastbound platform, and then reverse back to GLX once they get that switch in place to go from the loop track to the eastbound track north of Park.
SM89 wrote:They're building an awful lot of random rooms alongside the Brattle loop and one right in the middle of the western edge of the platform. What's up with that?The rooms on the Brattle Loop will be occupying the open space on the far side of the track, away from any egresses. Theres no need for that platform space seeing as you'd just have to cross the loop track to get out of there any way. Might as well make into storage rooms or offices.
The EGE wrote:Turning GLX trains at Government Center would be a very stupid idea indeed. No one wants to transfer to get to Park Street.Who would need to transfer at Park?
Disney Guy wrote:There is no need to terminate regular service trains from the north (Lechmere and beyond) at Brattle Loop. These trains can simply be regular service to and from the existing lines to the west.No need to? Anyone who has ever scheduled a bus or train run knows longer = bad. More chance for delays, breakdowns, service issues etc. If you can run the same service as two separate routes without inconveniencing passengers, you do it because of all the operational benefits.
The EGE wrote:The MBTA realizes that minimizing the number of transfers is vastly important to journey time.You mean the same MBTA that refuses to build the red-blue transfer, the same MBTA that keeps cutting the E line (forcing bus transfers), and the very same MBTA that plans on closing government center for two years?
jamesinclair wrote:Well said.The EGE wrote:The MBTA realizes that minimizing the number of transfers is vastly important to journey time.You mean the same MBTA that refuses to build the red-blue transfer, the same MBTA that keeps cutting the E line (forcing bus transfers), and the very same MBTA that plans on closing government center for two years?
Also the same MBTA that keeps the Hynes secondary entrance closed, rebuilt and then closed the second Arlington entrance, and then refused a developer request to open the other chinatown entrance?
The very same MBTA that said no to free signal priority in Brookline?
The same MBTA that sends the least frequent line, and ONLY the least frequent line to the very busy Lechmere bus transfer point?
It appears that the MBTA doesn't give a damn about rider travel time and inconveniences. So no, I dont buy the idea that the MBTA makes any sort of effort to minimize transfers.