Railroad Forums 

  • Type 7 Overhaul Program

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #1447834  by Type 7 3684
 
3705 is now withdrawn from service being prepped for the overhaul. Apparently it will be sent once the last 3600 car gets sent out.
 #1448309  by Type 7 3684
 
Yeah, now NETransit says that it may be repaired at Riverside early and they'll send another 3700 instead
Last edited by CRail on Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total. Reason: Unnecessary quote removed.
 #1449739  by F-line to Dudley via Park
 
3647 yanked today for prep-to-ship. Final two non-rebuilds in service are puke-teals 3674 and 3682...with 3621, 3687, 3695 now back in-testing. The non-rebuilt 36's are almost certainly in their last 2 weeks of service.

3705, which very briefly appeared in the prep-to-ship line after it broke, apparently only needed a quick fix and is reported back in-service.
 #1451111  by F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Bumper crop in the testing line: 3621, 3652, 3684, 3687, 3695 all jammed up looking to get cleared for return to service. 4 of those cars have been in-testing for 2 weeks now with 3684 being the only more-recent returnee, so Riverside is probably in a rush to clear that glut before staff vacations start later in the week.

This could indeed be the final week of service for remaining non-rebuilds 3674 and 3682 since it only takes 2 graduates from that overstuffed testing line to get both of them yanked.
 #1451578  by ST214
 
3682 is still in service, just saw it leading a very rusty Type 8 to Riverside.
 #1452730  by jonnhrr
 
ST214 wrote:3682 is still in service, just saw it leading a very rusty Type 8 to Riverside.
Type 8's rusty already? What does that say for the quality of the bodywork?
 #1452780  by deathtopumpkins
 
jonnhrr wrote:Type 8's rusty already? What does that say for the quality of the bodywork?
It says that they were built between 10 and 20 years ago, which is plenty of time to rust.
 #1452846  by dieciduej
 
ST214 wrote:3682 is still in service, just saw it leading a very rusty Type 8 to Riverside.
I haven't seen a rusty Type 8 myself. What I have noticed, by the articulation joint, is the car washer system just doesn't cut it. It usually leaves the grime and any rail/brake dust behind and after awhile it gets a rust appearance. The first batch of Type 7s, the 3600s, had a bad paint job which failed and the rust come it which I haven't scene on the Type 8s.

JoeD
 #1452855  by ST214
 
Basically, anywhere something stuck off the car or seams met, especially the one above the windows that stretches the entire car, was covered in rust. I saw several type 8’s with rust, but that one was by far the worst. Unfortunatly, I could not get the #.
Last edited by CRail on Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total. Reason: Unnecessary nesting quotes removed.
 #1452866  by dieciduej
 
I will put that on my look see list.

JoeD
Last edited by CRail on Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total. Reason: Unnecessary quote removed.
 #1453028  by jonnhrr
 
deathtopumpkins wrote:
jonnhrr wrote:Type 8's rusty already? What does that say for the quality of the bodywork?
It says that they were built between 10 and 20 years ago, which is plenty of time to rust.
I guess it's deceptive - you think of those cars as being relatively new, but they spent a lot of time sitting around until all the issues were resolved. I didn't realize the oldest of them were built in 1998.
Of course to someone as old as me, 1998 seems like last week :)
  • 1
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 39