Railroad Forums 

  • Pension deficit rises to almost $1.1 Billion

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #1390455  by BandA
 
Continuing the discussion from the 2016 Fare Increase thread....

https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/20 ... story.html
The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority is still awaiting the pension fund’s financial valuations for last year. But if the estimates prove accurate, the pension fund, with $1.5 billion in assets and $2.6 billion in future obligations, is now just 58 percent funded.
According to the T’s calculations, which will be made public Monday at a fiscal control board meeting, the MBTA pension fund’s assets declined 7 percent from 2005 through 2014, while the assets of the state teachers’ pension system -- managed by PRIM -- have increased 25 percent.
Michael Mulhern, the pension fund’s executive director, recently announced he would resign in August, after a decade on the job.
http://www.fox25boston.com/news/fox25-i ... /368168918
Michael Mulhern, the MBTA pension chief who FOX25 Investigates uncovered is headed for a publicly funded triple dipper retirement, won’t let taxpayers see his contract – a document some of his own board members at the secretive pension system haven’t even seen.

FOX25 has been asking for two weeks to see Mulhern’s contract, which pays him $282,000 a year, but the taxpayer-funded pension board won’t publicly release it.
 #1390523  by F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Huh...so that's where Mulhern went after leaving the GM's seat. I was wondering why he hadn't taken his "least convincing BRT salesflak ever" act to CT FasTrak or some other transparent rubber-tire grift by now. Guess he found a better way to enrich himself right under our noses.


Say what you will about the relative merits-vs.-demerits of the last 10 years' worth of individual MBTA GM's, but the brainpower and PR skillset occupying that seat improved by leaps and bounds at the Mulhern/Grabauskas transition compared to the revolving door of forgettable dreck that preceded.
 #1390623  by BandA
 
Grabauskas did a good job with the customer service part. But Romney and Grabauskas missed a major opportunity to make real changes: Romney controlled the T board, had his hand-picked GM Grabauskas running things, AND the union contracts came up for negotiation. He could have created a Fiscal Control Board ten years ago with a pen stroke, without even asking the legislature! But Romney wanted to run for President so he didn't want to make waves with the union, the legislature or take any service interruptions. It was clear to even the the casual observer even ten years ago the MBTA was/is insolvent.
 #1390763  by CRail
 
This thread has the potential of becoming really ugly really fast.

The MBTA is a public service which needs to be funded. If it isn't funded properly, it doesn't have money. Solvency isn't a possible concept for a publicly funded service. The concept is quite elementary. As far as pension "deficits," you're comparing future obligations to the present assets. Of course that doesn't line up, as the future obligations will be funded by future assets.They aren't paying the people who aren't retired yet, pension funds do the opposite of that, that's how it works... The legislature, which has sucked dry the public funds, is in search for new money and they found some. Now just to prove they could do it better despite the fact that they haven't over and over again...
 #1390784  by BandA
 
CRail wrote:This thread has the potential of becoming really ugly really fast.
Why?
Solvency isn't a possible concept for a publicly funded service.
Why not?
As far as pension "deficits," you're comparing future obligations to the present assets. Of course that doesn't line up, as the future obligations will be funded by future assets.They aren't paying the people who aren't retired yet, pension funds do the opposite of that, that's how it works...
A properly funded pension plan sets aside enough assets to cover future liabilities, assuming a reasonable return on investment. According to one of the articles, pension plans with less than 60% such as the MBTA are dangerously underfunded.

So now we have three areas where the MBTA is off by over $1,000,000,000: GLX, South Coast Rail, and the pension plan. And $7,000,000,000 deficit in state-of-good-repair
 #1390796  by dm1120
 
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 wrote:July 1st is going to be ugly on the first train that goes belly up
I looked up what my Zone 4 pass cost 10 years ago. In 2007 it was $186/month. Now in 2016 it's about to become $263/month. That's over a 35% increase in less than a decade. People are tired and frustrated of paying more and receiving less in return.
 #1390801  by YamaOfParadise
 
dm1120 wrote:
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 wrote:July 1st is going to be ugly on the first train that goes belly up
I looked up what my Zone 4 pass cost 10 years ago. In 2007 it was $186/month. Now in 2016 it's about to become $263/month. That's over a 35% increase in less than a decade. People are tired and frustrated of paying more and receiving less in return.
Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator pegs $186 in 2006 as being about equivalent in spending power to $221.65 today; so, that's only about a $40 increase in the relative price. An increase nonetheless, but not nearly as bad as it looks comparing the raw numbers.
 #1390824  by dm1120
 
YamaOfParadise wrote:
dm1120 wrote:
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 wrote:July 1st is going to be ugly on the first train that goes belly up
I looked up what my Zone 4 pass cost 10 years ago. In 2007 it was $186/month. Now in 2016 it's about to become $263/month. That's over a 35% increase in less than a decade. People are tired and frustrated of paying more and receiving less in return.
Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator pegs $186 in 2006 as being about equivalent in spending power to $221.65 today; so, that's only about a $40 increase in the relative price. An increase nonetheless, but not nearly as bad as it looks comparing the raw numbers.
Except that calculator doesn't account for inflation in Massachusetts, just national averages.

Regardless, the point is people are paying significantly more and receiving lower quality service. Where is the money going?
 #1390826  by Rockingham Racer
 
dm1120 wrote:
YamaOfParadise wrote:
dm1120 wrote:
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 wrote:July 1st is going to be ugly on the first train that goes belly up
I looked up what my Zone 4 pass cost 10 years ago. In 2007 it was $186/month. Now in 2016 it's about to become $263/month. That's over a 35% increase in less than a decade. People are tired and frustrated of paying more and receiving less in return.
Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator pegs $186 in 2006 as being about equivalent in spending power to $221.65 today; so, that's only about a $40 increase in the relative price. An increase nonetheless, but not nearly as bad as it looks comparing the raw numbers.
Except that calculator doesn't account for inflation in Massachusetts, just national averages.

Regardless, the point is people are paying significantly more and receiving lower quality service. Where is the money going?
Read today's Boston Globe about one of the mayor's aides, and you might have an insight. Greed, unfortunately.