by dbperry
Ahhh...
I think the 330 towers they are talking about needing are needed for the data link to the trains. All the PTC systems I've seen require a radio data link between the trains and the 'shore-side' control computers / network.
So fiber gets the signal to/from the towers, but you still need radios on towers on all the lines to communicate with the trains.
I think the 330 towers they are talking about needing are needed for the data link to the trains. All the PTC systems I've seen require a radio data link between the trains and the 'shore-side' control computers / network.
So fiber gets the signal to/from the towers, but you still need radios on towers on all the lines to communicate with the trains.
"Twitter Dave"
Engineering Manager, MBTA
MY POSTS HERE ARE UNOFFICIAL and are my own personal opinion. My posts are not official MBTA policy or communications.
https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/
Engineering Manager, MBTA
MY POSTS HERE ARE UNOFFICIAL and are my own personal opinion. My posts are not official MBTA policy or communications.
https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/