Railroad Forums 

  • Nov 2, 2020 CR Schedule Changes

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #1552613  by NRGeep
 
DMU's could be optimal off peak when distancing is possible and post pandemic during rush hour on some routes with many folks continuing to work from home permanently with cubicle office structures likely history.
 #1552679  by johnpbarlow
 
Given the T's current 10% of pre-pandemic level of ridership, some commuter rail train consists could be reduced to a double deck cab car plus locomotive - a DMU proxy! :wink:
 #1552682  by nomis
 
Given the inadequacies of the signal system on the system, you need those 4 car consists (5 cars on the dorchester branch) to operate at track speed.

Splitting consists with the goal of increasing operating sets would only be limited by the available quantity of: locomotives, cab cars, and toilet cars.
 #1552684  by johnpbarlow
 
nomis wrote: Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:04 am Given the inadequacies of the signal system on the system, you need those 4 car consists (5 cars on the dorchester branch) to operate at track speed.

Splitting consists with the goal of increasing operating sets would only be limited by the available quantity of: locomotives, cab cars, and toilet cars.
I guess things have changed since the RDC days wrt sigals?
And I wasn't advocating increasing train frequencies with the proxy DMU suggestion - perhaps some pruning of the frequencies should be implemented.
 #1552791  by Trinnau
 
It's a combination of increased regulation and increased focus on safety. Train stopping calculations are made based on the number of brakes on a train and how heavy the train is. MBTA's stopping distances are based on a 4-caoch train. Even though a shorter train is lighter, it doesn't have as many brakes to help stop it. So in other words, a 3-car train actually takes more distance to stop than a 4-car train.

Based on this factor, the MBTA signal system is spaced such that a 4-car train can stop safely from the maximum speed on the line. A 3-car train would not be able to reliably stop in time and could overrun the signal.
 #1552840  by johnpbarlow
 
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Trinnau. Very interesting and helpful. I'm guessing that any future DMU technology used by the MBTA would also require ~ 4 car set to operate? Or at least enough axles to stop the lighter-than-locomotive-hauled DMU consist safely.
 #1552884  by MBTA3247
 
I don't think the above calculations would apply to DMUs, as the braking power/ton ratio remains the same regardless of how many cars you have.
 #1552941  by Trinnau
 
Any DMU/EMU would need to be recalculated based on the brake rate they have and how that falls within the existing signal system. Keep in mind the current 4-car set includes the braking power of a locomotive in addition to the coaches. Now the ability to reliably shunt the signal system on the other hand may be an issue. Most railroads have a minimum axle requirement in the 12-16 range to not require additional protection. I think the MBTA's is either 16 or 20.

Back to the topic of schedules*, based on the T's recent history they are usually available about 3 weeks prior to the change date. So I'd expect details mid-October.

*Emphasis added by moderator
 #1554389  by sonicdoommario
 
Looks like the schedules for November 2 are up now.

https://www.mbta.com/schedules/commuter-rail

At least on the Providence line, there are a lot more morning outbound trains as opposed to before. Looks like some of the express service is back, and there appear to be several added non-peak inbound express trains. 808 is back to its normal self, although the Attleboro short-turn (842) is no longer on the schedule.

Also, on the Worcester line, the outbound Heart-to-Hub is no longer there, and the inbound Heart-to-Hub now stops at Framingham instead of a clean shot from Worcester to Boston.
 #1554418  by charlesriverbranch
 
MBTA3247 wrote: Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:58 pm I don't think the above calculations would apply to DMUs, as the braking power/ton ratio remains the same regardless of how many cars you have.
I still don't understand why the number of cars effects the ability to brake. Doesn't each car have the same number of brakes per ton? Why should the stopping distance of five cars be any different than the stopping distance of a single car?
 #1554430  by MBTA3247
 
With locomotive-hauled trains, the locomotive has roughly the same braking power as a coach, but considerably more weight. Adding more cars spreads that weight across more brakes, increasing the braking power/ton ratio.
 #1554547  by Trinnau
 
sonicdoommario wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 3:14 pm Also, on the Worcester line, the outbound Heart-to-Hub is no longer there, and the inbound Heart-to-Hub now stops at Framingham instead of a clean shot from Worcester to Boston.
It's there, it's just earlier in the rush hour now like the inbound one is. Also stops at Framingham.