shadyjay wrote:newpylong wrote:I can guarantee you Pan Am will not allow the line to be cab signalled as well - unless they are getting some of the funds themselves to purchase cab signal boxes. Everytime they ran a local or coal train down there they would need to find a cab signalled leader. It just wouldn't fly...
Don't forget Pan-Am already has cab signal-equipped locomotives - required to operate on Amtrak's Springfield Line in order to reach their isolated track from Berlin to Waterbury CT. I believe some of the "MEC" fleet is cab signal-equipped. And those trains run from East Deerfield down to CT. So only a couple more locos would need to have cab signals in order to supply power for the Mt Tom coal trains.
Never say never with Pan-Am. You just never know........
The Conn River improvements stand to benefit PAS the most, and NS is itching for this link. NS certainly wouldn't have any trouble sending cabbed units up this way. And, hey, crippling power shortages are a PAR way of life. They do a fine FAIL on a daily basis getting their full slate crewed and on the tracks. Would that be any different regardless of signal system?
Ultimately, what Amtrak wants Amtrak is going to get. PAR once again hits the jackpot with another lucky opportunity to get Fed $$$ to upgrade their negligently-maintained mainlines. I don't think they'd care if the line were signaled with PTC or tuxedo-dressed monkey butlers stationed at every control point. They ain't paying for it, and they're reaping free benefits from it. That's all Fink and Mellon care about.