Railroad Forums 

  • Why 4 axle RDMTs and not 6 axles?

  • Discussion of the operations of CSX Transportation, from 1980 to the present. Official site can be found here: CSXT.COM.
Discussion of the operations of CSX Transportation, from 1980 to the present. Official site can be found here: CSXT.COM.

Moderator: MBTA F40PH-2C 1050

 #80760  by TerryC
 
When the RDMTs were made, why did CSXT use 4 axle GP30s and GP35s? Why not use SD35s, SD35Ms, or SD40s? Could CSXT have gutted a U Boat ballast it, put EMD traction motors on the trucks, and make it a G.E version of the RDMT?

keep asking keep learning
HAPPY BOXING DAY

 #80780  by crazy_nip
 
you ask some of the stupidest questions...

 #80944  by roadster
 
Terry C
Most RDMTs are used in local service, (up here anyway) where six axles can sometimes be banned by track curvature. Also, the 4 xls units give higher tractive effort with the same HP of a single unit. (imagine an 8 xl 3000 HP engine) so less fuel is used during switching and industrial work.
Nip,
to blurt out that a question is stupid on this forum is an insult to all members. Maybe I am mistaken but I was under the impression that people could ask questions and share info. here, not be insulted for trying to learn. Shame on you!!!

 #81186  by Robert Paniagua
 
Nip,
to blurt out that a question is stupid on this forum is an insult to all members. Maybe I am mistaken but I was under the impression that people could ask questions and share info. here, not be insulted for trying to learn. Shame on you!!!


Thanks, I agree with you Roadster.

Just take a look at the EMD forum for some evidence of him telling off TerryC. I think Nip needs to be more sensitive to others.

 #81221  by TerryC
 
Thank you for the information, Robert Paniagua and roadster!

keep asking keep learning

 #81340  by charlie6017
 
"be nice crazy_nip"

Please do.............