Railroad Forums 

  • Amtrak Downeaster Discussion Thread

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

 #1522946  by Dick H
 
Major Construction on the Main St. Bridge in Saco next weekend. 10/25 - 10/27
On October 26 & 27, Pan Am Railways and Maine Department of Transportation will be performing construction work at Main Street in Saco, ME that will impact Downeaster service. This work includes the complete replacement of the Main Street bridge which carries both train and automotive traffic. Click below for details of no Saco service and busing between Brunswick and Wells.

https://amtrakdowneaster.com/service-alerts
 #1523078  by gokeefe
 
Wow ... The concrete looks terrible in Street view ... Thought there were some bridge timber replacement planned on some of the other Saco bridges as well. Perhaps not this weekend ...
 #1523097  by johnpbarlow
 
I'm guessing if the concrete road surface is being replaced on the Main St bridge, that the rails for the abandoned 2nd track will also be removed?
Attachments:
Saco Main St Bridge 2.JPG
Saco Main St Bridge 2.JPG (212.44 KiB) Viewed 1247 times
 #1523102  by BM6569
 
"As it nears 20 years in operation, the Downeaster passenger train service is weighing options to become a reliable means of regional transit, not just a rail connection from southern Maine to Boston.

But expanding service may require big changes – possible new stations in Portland and West Falmouth, a commuter-friendly schedule and new rail lines to Westbrook and Lewiston-Auburn.

The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority, the agency that runs the Downeaster, plans an open house Tuesday in Portland to introduce its ideas and get public feedback."

https://www.masstransitmag.com/rail/new ... er-service
 #1523135  by MEC407
 
johnpbarlow wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:35 am I'm guessing if the concrete road surface is being replaced on the Main St bridge, that the rails for the abandoned 2nd track will also be removed?
Maybe, maybe not. The bridge as it appears today is the result of a major rebuild that happened approximately 20 years ago if I remember correctly. I lived in that area when they were rebuilding it. The second track had been gone for decades but they kept it as a two-track crossing when they rebuilt it.
 #1523143  by swist
 
Trains are regularly late out of Portland or into Freeport because of two severe speed restrictions that have been in place for months. There is no sign of any worker activity at these places.

1) Between the start of the Brunswick branch at Royal Crossing up to Yarmouth Crossing (North of the new siding project) and not apparently related).

2) In Portland near that abandoned yard between Allen Ave & Read St. This one is under 10mph!

Anyone know what's going on?
 #1523178  by markhb
 
I wouldn't call Deering Junction abandoned; I've seen them use it for manipulating cars destined for the other side of Forest Ave. No idea what's happening there, though.

I went to the open house tonight. The biggest ideas NNEPRA has going on would seem to be the Wells Siding project, the West Falmouth stop, the commuter service (meaning a 6th trip making a short turn at Wells and returning to Portland In the morning), and a new Portland Station. One thing that was mentioned that I didn't realize was that building the wye would only save 5 minutes between Saco and Freeport.
 #1523219  by markhb
 
Essentially, it takes 15. minutes from the time the train pulls off at Mountain Junction to the time it gets back there after stopping at POR. It would take 10 minutes with the wye in place, presumably including time for whatever needs to be done when changing ends. The current feeling is that the cost of the wye is quite steep for the time improvement they would get.
 #1523226  by swist
 
And it could be less than 15 minutes with (a) a bit of speed increase on the mtn branch - most trains literally crawl into the station, and (b) a little more urgency in turning the train around at the station - get the boarding passengers onto the platform sooner, get the disembarking passengers lined up in the train (some conductors are better than others at this), use multiple doors more efficiently.
 #1523236  by gokeefe
 
Having seen it up close and personal in a role as a partner to the service there is very little that can be done to speed up arrivals and departures at the PTC.

A full length platform would be the only improvement that might really help. The current configuration is pretty much being maxed. I think NNEPRA's take on it at this point has become "Why build the leg if we can get a new station on the Main Line for the same/similar money?"

At a $10,000,000 price tag for the northbound leg they're probably dead on ...
 #1523240  by TRNE
 
George, Patricia made a compelling argument about a Mainline station at last night's Open House. The 100+ attendees put it at the top of their priority list (of course, they didn't bring as money to the table). Her presentation can be seen at http://www.trainridersne.org
 #1523242  by gokeefe
 
Thank you! Good to hear the Open House was supportive of that objective. I'm very optimistic that it will help enhance the existing service. Hopefully there will be discussion of how to continue to cooperate with Concord Coach lines in whatever way makes sense.
  • 1
  • 569
  • 570
  • 571
  • 572
  • 573
  • 631