electricron wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 11:14 am
The Cardinal leaves NYP at 645 am eastern and is scheduled to arrive at CUS at 1020 am central the following morning1q. That’s 28 hours and 35 minutes on the train when it is on time. That easily is 3 meals at least, lunch, dinner, and breakfast: or four meals at most, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and breakfast. Most airline flights serve zero meals with snacks only, few flights include one meal and fewer flights Include more than one meal. Most Amtrak long distance trains west of Chicago include six meals, and one has at least eight meals. Why are we comparing airline meals with long distance train meals?
Should we not be comparing Amtrak long distance meals to cruise line meals? The Texas Eagle #421 or #422 takes longer between Chicago and Los Angeles than some short cruises from LA or Miami. If we were, Amtrak meals would not even rate a single star.
Not really, in pre-pandemic terms.
First, most of the flights you're citing are below five hours long. That's... between mealtimes. That means you're eating not on the plane but in the airport. So you need the overnight intercontinental flights to compare with, which DO have a meal.
Second, cruise lines have full kitchens and bars. The only comparison is LD lines that are 2-night trips (anything north/south or the west coast to Chicago or New Orleans). As elaborated in the Dining car thread, having a full diner on overnighters is a bit of a stretch.
Third, the cafe car is basically day-trip material you can get at 7-Eleven.
So you have to compare overnight LD with overseas air travel, and cruise lines with 2-night LD.
General consensus is the following ranking:
- Cruise line food
- 2-night LD food
- Overseas air travel food
- Overnight LD "FlexDining" food. (except breakfast)
- 7-11
- The cafe's food (including Overnight LD "FlexDining").
Can food on trains be done better? Of course.