Railroad Forums 

  • SELECTED ON-TIME PERFORMANCE 2/29/20 THROUGH 3/29/20

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

 #1538651  by shlustig
 
Results for this period are:

TOTAL TRAINS = 1086

ON TIME = 564 (52%)

LATE = 522 (48%)

AVERAGE DELAY = 49"

Of the late trains:
54% were 29" or less late;
24% were 30" to 59" late;
9% were 1' to 2' late;
12% were more than 2' late; and
1% had no arrival time shown.
NO GRACE PERIOD IS ALLOWED; ON TIME IS ON TIME & LATE IS LATE!

BY ROUTE, WITH ON-TIME % AND AVERAGE DELAY:

CAPITOL LIMITED
#29 - 30% - 37"
#30 - 43% - 32"

CARDINAL (WAS)
#51 - 69% - 22"
#50 - 62% - 2' 27"

PENNSYLVANIAN
#43 - CANCELLED
#42 - CANCELLED

LAKE SHORE LIMITED
#49 - 53% - 44"
#48 - 63% - 33"

LAKE SHORE LIMITED (BOSTON / ALBANY)
#449 - 64% - 19"
#448 - 22% - 42"

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS
#59 - 83% - 13"
#58 - 90% - 2' 33"

CRESCENT (WAS)
#19 - 0% - 3' 07"
#20 - 7% - 1' 48"

DETROIT CORRIDOR
(W) - 29% - 24"
(E) - 53% - 31"

ST. LOUIS CORRIDOR
(W) - 71% - 16"
(E) - 62% - 1' 17"

BUFFALO CORRIDOR
(W) - 16% - 26"
(E) - 71% - 25"

KANSAS CITY CORRIDOR
(W) - 70% - 42"
(E) - 53% - 42"

Approximately 110 of the trains normally included in the review were cancelled as part of the Amtrak service reduction with an additional 22 trains not included due to programmed trackwork and other operational problems.

Services which improved in both measured categories include the eastbound Crescent and DET Corridor and the westbound Capitol Limited, Cardinal, Lake Shore Limited, and STL Corridor.

The average delays for the eastbound Cardinal, northbound City of New Orleans, and eastbound STL Corridor were inflated due to several extreme delays on the long-distance trains which were due to mechanical "issues" and host carrier causes.

Of the 64 trains that were more than 2' late: the Crescent accounted for 34; Texas Eagle (on the EB STL Corridor) for 14; and Lake Shore Limited for 5.

Of the total delay minutes in this period: the BUF Corridor accounted for 12%; the STL Corridor for 17 %; and the Crescent for 35%.

It would be interesting to know what the former heads of Amtrak who were good operating people would think about the current performance level.
 #1538712  by ThirdRail7
 
shlustig wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:53 pm It would be interesting to know what the former heads of Amtrak who were good operating people would think about the current performance level.
If they were "good operating" people, they probably wouldn't be that offended knowing:

Regulations have changed.
Traffic patterns have changed.
Train lengths have changed.
Track ownership has changed.
Infrastructures have constricted, reducing available routes and causing congestion
PTC related delays continue to plague the network(I rarely, if ever see a break down of PTC related issues in your delays) and that is something that didn't exist until recently.

As such, pining for the days of yesteryear (oh what great railroaders we were!) would accomplish little. I would be interested in knowing how they'd adapt in the face of increasing regulations (remember, a train could move without a conductor until 2012), PTC ( gone are the calls to "give me a move ! as you sit at the border of PTC operating boundaries, hoping everything has loaded correctly) and increasingly hostile hosts that have gone all the way to the Supreme Court to push aside potential operating metrics for OTP.

It would be interesting to what they would think and how they'd act in an era without host cooperation and in some cases, downright hostility.