mtuandrew wrote:If it’s the Silver Starve, it ought to be the Silver MeatierCongratulations on Silver Meatier. Perfect.
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
mtuandrew wrote:If it’s the Silver Starve, it ought to be the Silver MeatierCongratulations on Silver Meatier. Perfect.
F40CFan wrote:Then I would think if the Star is considered a sleeper passenger magnet, I'd transfer one of the sleepers from the Meteor over to the Star and cash in until CAF delivers the new sleepers.My hypothesis: Given on already paying the fixed costs for the diner, the marginal revenue of a sleeper passenger on the Meteor is probably higher than that on the Star, so they'd rather have more Meteor passengers than more Star passengers.
BandA wrote:flerrg? Koffefe!Ah the joys of posting from the cell phone ...
Mackensen wrote:I'm in this exact same boat. I'm 36 and I travel almost only for business. I avoid the buffs holding court in the diner/lounge because, among other things, half their information is a bit off usually.Tadman wrote:Agreed. Most of the bad news has been anecdotal and come from three sources - Trains Mag, PTJ, and NARP. Most of their writers and personnel seem to be of the same mind: "We must preserve A-day which has the mission of preserving 1959". Hard pass... makes no sense and probably doesn't make financial sense either.I found it rather telling that Bob Johnston at Trains wrote several pieces on the changes, dwelt at length on the supposed difficulty passengers were having with the packaging (I did not observe such and had no real problems myself), and avoided the question of food quality. Make of that what you will. Admittedly, I'm an atypical sleeper passenger. I travel on business. I'm under 40. I've had good times in the dining car but I could take it or leave it as a social function (I could definitely leave listening to railfans in their 60s and 70s complaining about management).
Train2009 wrote:Viewliner diner 68020 is traveling right now as I speak on the back of Train #137 as per a post on Facebook's Amtrak Northeast Corridor Railfans.Confirmed: O/S GUNPOW @ 20:49
ApproachMedium wrote:yea i saw it on there from train 90. Where was this car coming from? They have not started any service back up south of richmond yet.That car was sitting on the storage track in South Hampton St yard for at least a month now, was added to 137 yesterday am and sent packing.
Backshophoss wrote:This might be a car finally cut loose by CAF quietly.20 - Providence has been on the property "for a while"; the remaining undelivered Diners are 00 Albany, 10 Dover, and 11 Frankfort.