North Carolina uses Amfleets for the Carolinian which is why I included them in the list of off-corridor services that would benefit from improved fleet availability.
The PRIIA formulas for state funded services would not be very forgiving to PennDOT if they wished to elect Acela equipment over Amfleets. This would be a major change for a state service that already has had to absorb a major cost increase related to how Amtrak must charge for electric traction.
If Bombardier (or Alstom ... whoever it is) is able to repower the HHP-8's I think there is every reason to believe that the Acela's may be considered for retention in secondary service. The one downside is that the Acela would cost Amtrak some capacity in seat availability versus the Northeast Regional trainsets.
Noting who is in charge right now at Amtrak I'm having a hard time believing that an airline executive would so readily throw away highly specialized equipment that commands a premium fare. Airline industry practice would clearly point towards refurbishment and reuse on secondary routes or schedules.
The PRIIA formulas for state funded services would not be very forgiving to PennDOT if they wished to elect Acela equipment over Amfleets. This would be a major change for a state service that already has had to absorb a major cost increase related to how Amtrak must charge for electric traction.
If Bombardier (or Alstom ... whoever it is) is able to repower the HHP-8's I think there is every reason to believe that the Acela's may be considered for retention in secondary service. The one downside is that the Acela would cost Amtrak some capacity in seat availability versus the Northeast Regional trainsets.
Noting who is in charge right now at Amtrak I'm having a hard time believing that an airline executive would so readily throw away highly specialized equipment that commands a premium fare. Airline industry practice would clearly point towards refurbishment and reuse on secondary routes or schedules.
gokeefe