Railroad Forums 

  • New lines in Nigeria

  • Discussion about railroad topics everywhere outside of Canada and the United States.
Discussion about railroad topics everywhere outside of Canada and the United States.

Moderators: Komachi, David Benton

 #235891  by george matthews
 
This is an interesting story.
http://www.vanguardngr.com/articles/200 ... 42006.html
I wonder what gauge the new lines will be?

I have travelled by train in Nigeria, 25 years ago. I travelled from Kano, where I had left my car to be collected when I flew back, to near Lagos. Actually I only got as far as Ilorin as the track had been washed away and I had to continue by taxi. I missed my flight from Lagos to Nairobi.

I also travelled once from Kaduna to Kano.

The track gauge was Cape gauge. I have heard that since then the railways have been in a sad state. But now that oil price is again high, perhaps they are going to spend some money.

There used to be container trains from Lagos to the North.

 #236042  by Sir Ray
 
I'm tempted to say, that seeing as how the article is saying they will rehabilitate the rail system as opposed to replacing it, they will continue to use Cape Gauge (1067mm) to avoid costs in regrading, easing curvature, etc. (although it sounds like a lot of bridges need replacing).

 #236121  by David Benton
 
i rode these lines about 15 years ago , the track seemd in reasonable condition , but the engine kept breaking down . ( despite my self appointed guides assurances that he had talked to the engine driver , to ensure my speedy and safe trip ).

 #237905  by george matthews
 
David Benton wrote:i rode these lines about 15 years ago , the track seemd in reasonable condition , but the engine kept breaking down . ( despite my self appointed guides assurances that he had talked to the engine driver , to ensure my speedy and safe trip ).
This is the most interesting new line planned.
West East railway
(Ibadan-Ife-Ilesha-Akure-Owo-Benin-Onitsha-Enugu), Railway link to TinCan Island, Ajaokuta Warri railway line, Itakpe-Ajaokuta-Ore and a bridge over the River Niger.
All the time I was in Nigeria - nearly four years - I thought an east-west route was essential. The colonial regime built mainly to take northern crops to the coast and the independent regimes never bothered to do anything to develop the network.
resume of public regular service of three times a week on Lagos-Kano railway route.
It sounds as though the system is in a bad way if they are talking of "restoring" a thrice weekly train from Lagos to Kano.

When I was there it was daily, and well filled.

 #237919  by george matthews
 
David Benton wrote:i rode these lines about 15 years ago , the track seemd in reasonable condition , but the engine kept breaking down . ( despite my self appointed guide's assurances that he had talked to the engine driver, to ensure my speedy and safe trip ).
Here is another proposal which I hoped for, years ago - to link the Cape gauge lines of Nigeria with those of Ghana. In between are the derelict metre gauge lines of Togo and Benin (Dahomey).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/693683.stm

It does look as though some of these proposals will actually happen.

And now I have found some possibly useful information. The plan is to build some standard gauge lines.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_in_Nigeria

 #239529  by KevinSinclair
 
It will be wonderful if these railways are restored. As with much of the infrastructure in Nigeia they are in poor condition, but a restored system could really assist their economy.
 #240266  by Sir Ray
 
Way back in Jr High School during the end of the 70s (1979 to be precise), in World History (i.e. non-American history) we concentrated on European History and Asian History (for some reason I remember a whole class spend on Indian cooking and lifestyle - pretty cool cooking vessels they brought in). Anyway Africa was given about a week...
And in this week, our Teacher discussed the Capetown to Cairo railroad, which of course was never built, and how it would have really opened up Africa to development and boosted it's economy. What do you guys think (assuming the gauge problem was worked out, and Germany agreed to allow Britian a ROW across it's colonial terrority - start the clock at, say 1890).
(We may have discussed this on the old board, but I think that was more which routes African could have used nowadays).
 #240387  by george matthews
 
Sir Ray wrote:Way back in Jr High School during the end of the 70s (1979 to be precise), in World History (i.e. non-American history) we concentrated on European History and Asian History (for some reason I remember a whole class spend on Indian cooking and lifestyle - pretty cool cooking vessels they brought in). Anyway Africa was given about a week...
And in this week, our Teacher discussed the Capetown to Cairo railroad, which of course was never built, and how it would have really opened up Africa to development and boosted its economy. What do you guys think (assuming the gauge problem was worked out, and Germany agreed to allow Britian a ROW across it's colonial terrority - start the clock at, say 1890).
(We may have discussed this on the old board, but I think that was more which routes African could have used nowadays).
I think that the Cape to Cairo railway was an imperialist fantasy of Cecil Rhodes. It would not have had any economic point.

All the railways that were built had an economic intention - except perhaps the Uganda Railway from Mombasa to Kisumu. That purpose was always to transport produce from the interior to the Coast. The Uganda railway was billed as a cure for the slave trade, but did become economically useful.

South Africa had a network because there were European settlements and industrial sites all over. The lines to the north were to support first the European settlements in Rhodesia and then the mines. The tentacles of the southern African industrial economy reached as far north as the Congo Copper Belt (partly in modern Zambia). Those lines were all Cape Gauge.

The East African lines were all metre gauge and were built for local purposes. The Uganda Railway created the conditions for British settlement in the Highlands of Kenya and opened up industrial plantations in Uganda itself. The German line from Dar es Salaam to Kigoma was built to enable Germany to control that area and for trade. There was no point in any connection to the south (or north). In Uganda a line to the north of the country was built in the 1960s but never seems to have attracted enough business and is probably derelict at present.

What would have been the point of a rail line from Uganda to Sudan?

Now that there is oil in Sudan there are grandiose plans for more railways in southern Sudan, but their main motivation is political. The Southerners want to link more with the southern states - Uganda and Kenya - to get out of the domination by the Arabs of the northern Sudan. Will they be built? We shall see.

Sudan is not connected to Egypt by rail. Maybe the oil wealth will see a connection built. If so, I hope it is to European standard gauge as is used in Egypt.

Africa is full of proposed railways. So far none of the recently proposed lnes have been started. Nigeria has the money - while oil prices remain as high as they are at present. Sudan may have the money but the oil is only just beginning, and there is always the danger of war.

To build a Cape gauge line from Dar es Salaam where the Tazara line ends (built to carry Zambian copper when Rhodesia was in rebellion) to Sudan would be possible but who would finance it and what would the return be? Regauging the East African lines would also be possible but at huge expense - and metre gauge allows tighter curves so that civil engineering work would be needed.

There are proposals to cross the continent from east to west. Can anything come of that? The Kasese line in Uganda - currently derelict - could be extended into the Congo. Uganda army officers have been looting eastern Congo of its minerals but that is not the basis of a settled industry.

Chad is going to have an oil industry. Perhaps the Nigerian lines may be extended into Chad. That would leave a gap to Sudan. I think that is fantasy.

 #240396  by David Benton
 
There is very little trade between african countries . Proberly nigeria is the exception in that it can sell its oil to nieghbouring countries . ( what isnt smuggled across the border that is , its about 10 times the price in Benin as it is in Nigeria offically . so locals smuggle it across the border in whiskey bottles , 1 litre at a time . pay a bribe to border officals and still make money ) . so inter country traffic would be light i would imagine .
genrally all rail lines run to the nearest port .

 #240532  by george matthews
 
David Benton wrote:There is very little trade between african countries . Proberly nigeria is the exception in that it can sell its oil to nieghbouring countries . ( what isnt smuggled across the border that is , its about 10 times the price in Benin as it is in Nigeria offically . so locals smuggle it across the border in whiskey bottles , 1 litre at a time . pay a bribe to border officals and still make money ) . so inter country traffic would be light i would imagine .
generally all rail lines run to the nearest port .
Nigeria is a transit link to Niger and Chad. That could be done by rail instead of the huge lorries that churn up the roads - no-one weighs the lorries and so the fourth power rule applies. If Chad actually does have oil then their need for transport will increase. Of course they may want to use Cameroon as their link. Cameroon has a metre gauge system but it only reaches halfway up the country. Maiduguri is the nearest railhead to Chad.