george matthews wrote:If they build a high speed link alongside the existing route, or on a new alignment, it should be Standard gauge, to allow for future cross channel links.
If one ever coughs up the cash for it!
george matthews wrote:The Unionists in NI do ask for closer relations with the British mainland. However, there are now complications. How it will develop is very uncertain. Theresa May perhaps has the intention of staying in the EU while giving the impression she wants to leave. The big question in NI is about the Border with the Republic. At present there is freedom of travel. There are few checks at the crossing. (I can remember when there were actual checks, with a border official getting on the train and walking through.) If Britain is outside the EU and Ireland remains in, will the border have to be reactivated? I have seen no mention of this problem so far.
If there's one thing both the Nationalist/Republican and Unionist/Loyalist camps wholeheartedly agree on it's that the return of a "hard border" would be the worst thing possible. It's bad enough that there is legitimate fear that violence could very well erupt again (The Troubles really haven't gone away over the past 18 years, it's just been reduced to a much reduced state of violence) though I do find it hard to believe that it could get catastrophically bad. One conduit that in many ways keeps the two countries together is the railway line.
In the end though the 3 Billion Euros would probably be better spent on revitalizing abandoned routes in the Republic and the North including Letterkenny-Derry. The Dublin-Belfast line really only needs a 3rd track in places here or there south of Dundalk and north/east of Portadown for added frequencies where IE and NIR commuter rail traffic eats into time slots and perhaps additional equipment. I really don't see how a new ROW and/or electrification would be a worthwhile investment.