Railroad Forums 

  • NLX Northern Lights Express HSR MN Duluth-Twin Cities

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

 #1117733  by Jeff Smith
 
Interesting. Northland News Center
High Speed Rail Gains Speed in the Northland

he project was one of 22 successful applicants picked in May of 2011 to receive a 5 million dollar grant from the U.S Department of Transportation.
The train also received 1.1 million dollars in funding from the federal railroad administration.
But money isn't the only thing backing NLX.
"I'll pound on the president's door, I'll pound on the transportation secretary's door, I'll pound on every member of that congress until we get this thing funded and get it moving," said Congressmen Rick Nolon.
...
Taking the train to the twin cities from Duluth would take about 2 hours and fifteen minutes with three stops in between.
 #1117734  by Jeff Smith
 
 #1174987  by mtuandrew
 
Aside from the postings here and a few notes on the Northstar Commuter Rail Facebook page, I haven't heard a thing about it recently at the state government level or among local railroad types (professional or amateur, like myself.) Thanks for finding this information, NH2060.

It seems like BNSF would get more use from a non-dedicated second main from Isanti to Hinckley, unless they are actively avoiding whatever equipment would be necessary to run freight on a 110 mph line. Does the plan call for 110 mph over any of the other stretches from Isanti south or Hinckley north?
 #1223721  by electricron
 
This rail corridor length is 155 miles, the projected elapse time of travel is 2 hours and 15 minutes.
That means this train will average 68.88 mph. Assuming each of the three intermediate stations loses 5 minutes, the train can cover the 155 miles in 2 hours of traveling time, now averaging 77.5 mph. Hello, a conventional passenger train over Class IV tracks can reach 79 mph. Can this really be classified as a high speed rail corridor?
 #1223735  by NH2060
 
electricron wrote:This rail corridor length is 155 miles, the projected elapse time of travel is 2 hours and 15 minutes.
That means this train will average 68.88 mph. Assuming each of the three intermediate stations loses 5 minutes, the train can cover the 155 miles in 2 hours of traveling time, now averaging 77.5 mph. Hello, a conventional passenger train over Class IV tracks can reach 79 mph. Can this really be classified as a high speed rail corridor?
Well you're comparing average speeds of 68.88 mph and 77.5 mph vs. an absolute top speed of 79 mph. But to be fair to your calculations only certain stretches (still an overall significant portion nonetheless) of the route will be rated for 110 mph.

I for one am not sure if the Minneapolis-Duluth corridor even warrants a higher-speed rail service like this, but the folks at NLX must know what they're doing and, therefore, must be doing something right. I do think at the very least a 79 mph service with perhaps 2-3 RTs per day is a reasonable minimum service level.
 #1223938  by mtuandrew
 
NH2060 wrote:
electricron wrote:This rail corridor length is 155 miles, the projected elapse time of travel is 2 hours and 15 minutes.
That means this train will average 68.88 mph. Assuming each of the three intermediate stations loses 5 minutes, the train can cover the 155 miles in 2 hours of traveling time, now averaging 77.5 mph. Hello, a conventional passenger train over Class IV tracks can reach 79 mph. Can this really be classified as a high speed rail corridor?
Well you're comparing average speeds of 68.88 mph and 77.5 mph vs. an absolute top speed of 79 mph. But to be fair to your calculations only certain stretches (still an overall significant portion nonetheless) of the route will be rated for 110 mph.

I for one am not sure if the Minneapolis-Duluth corridor even warrants a higher-speed rail service like this, but the folks at NLX must know what they're doing and, therefore, must be doing something right. I do think at the very least a 79 mph service with perhaps 2-3 RTs per day is a reasonable minimum service level.
But the unofficial minimum speed limit on I-35 is 79 mph! :P

In theory, the State could start this service tomorrow by using laid-over Northstar equipment and contracting with BNSF for slots. I don't know whether any parts of the Hinckley and Superior Subs are rated for 79 mph though, let alone their entire distances, and the NLX website makes it clear that BNSF requires extra sidings at the very least for proper train movement. I think the demand is there, as long as MnDOT actually gets all the way to Duluth - no stopping halfway, like with the Northstar service and St. Cloud.
 #1304235  by NH2060
 
So it's been awhile, but some recent news on the NLX:

The Minnesota DOT to host 4 open houses on the project:
http://www.progressiverailroading.com/h ... ice--42669" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The NLX is to be added to the state's 2015 State Rail Plan update:
Ken Buehler, a member of the Northern Lights Express Joint Alliance, said there are four passenger trains MnDOT is including in this plan, adding that the Northern Lights Express is one getting high priority as they vy for federal backing.

http://www.wdio.com/article/stories/s3623090.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 #1333275  by NH2060
 
Still in the planning stages, but progress is being made:
According to Francis Loetterle, MnDOT project manager, a second-level environmental review is currently being conducted, as well as ridership forecasts, revenue projections and cost-benefit analysis.

The environmental work is expected to be completed in February 2016, while the ridership, revenue and cost-benefit study, which will include capital and operation cost estimates and the number of trips each day, is anticipated to be done this summer, Loetterle said.

http://abcnewspapers.com/2015/05/15/pla ... s-express/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9