Having read the article, I am inclined to note the following. Nathan Fenno, the cororate spokesman in this case(and corporate counsel full time, I believe)was towing the company line. The railroad in the past has gotten grants to upgrade and maintain their properties(I believe the whole OnTrack service in the Syracuse area is the result of some financial underwriting,so correct me if I'm wrong.) In the past, WR and the board have shown themsleves to be, if nothing else, shrewd businessmen who have made the NYS&W into what it has become. And that is a regional railroad with some pretty decent amount of business along both its divisions.
I am curious as to why the railroad would be content with having to pay CSX to move equipment to Utica via Syracuse for mechanical work and inspections. It just seems to me that there is an underlying subtext to this. Maybe the railroad simply doesn't want to foot the bill, and crying poverty/insufficent monies is their tactic. They have also employed the "we don't have the money" tactic when it comes to labor negotiaions, as the BLE&T union is now over 3 YEARS without a contract and the commpany management is attempting to "starve" the crews by eliminating any and all overtime. As a customer driven industry, the company should never let the customer come second to some bean counting corporate minion who has something to prove by "playing hardball" with the unions for his own personal own gain and let the communities and customers come second.
There is plenty of money in Washington and Albany to go around, and since both legislative bodies spend like drunken sailors, I'm suprised the railroad hasn't suggested that some grant money be made available for repairs.(Could a new Democratic Governor in Albany have something to do with the railroad's reluctance to pursue funds on a state level? Hmmmmmm...)
I just find it interesting in terms of timing and such. If the railroad wanted to make repairs, they could find the money as in the past, NYRI project or not. Just that their cry of not enough money in the bank comes at the same time they are refusing to settle the outstanding labor agreement with the BLE&T. And this claim of not enough money to make even basic repairs would, on the surface, boost their poverty claims should the labor negotiations go to arbitration and a settlement be imposed. And yet, the railroad has been sending locomotives out for overhaul and rehab(some units for two and three attempts, even!), which they have to pay for. I just find their argument and timing somewhat suspect, and some of their tactics even more so.
I know I'm getting old... My insurance company sent me only half a calendar this year!