Originally, the CSS had interchanges with B&O at Miller (site of recent derailment) and East Chicago. During the regulated era this made sense as the railroad carried a lot of bridge traffic and to maximize profit on bridge traffic, you had to use the interchange ICC directed you to use rather than the nearest interchange.
Since deregulation, the East Chicago interchange has been pulled up. What was the reasoning behind giving up EC but keeping Miller? Is the only traffic off CSX the coal train for Bailly Generating? Does CSX attempt to gain any Arcelor traffic from Burns Harbor via CSS? At the time of the Chessie acquisition, the Chessie-controlled B&O served every Bethlehem Steel mill and the CSS was seen as a Chessie-owned conduit for this traffic from the new Bethlehem mill (and a car source for cash-poor CSS).
Since deregulation, the East Chicago interchange has been pulled up. What was the reasoning behind giving up EC but keeping Miller? Is the only traffic off CSX the coal train for Bailly Generating? Does CSX attempt to gain any Arcelor traffic from Burns Harbor via CSS? At the time of the Chessie acquisition, the Chessie-controlled B&O served every Bethlehem Steel mill and the CSS was seen as a Chessie-owned conduit for this traffic from the new Bethlehem mill (and a car source for cash-poor CSS).
The new Acela: It's not Aveliable.