Railroad Forums
Moderator: GOLDEN-ARM
Justin B wrote:UP also inherited a good number of them from SP..
you consider 25 units a "good number"??25 may seem small in comparison to UPs later 1000 unit order, but 25 locomotives are not chump change. They represented a sizeable investment, especially for a cash strapped SP at the time. They were purchased right before the merger, so one could logically speculate that these might have been some icing on the cake for the UP folks. I would venture to guess that SP would have bought more SD70s had there been more money available.
thats all they got from SP
Justin B wrote:Compared to the quantities of other locomotive models on the SP roster and the total number of locomotives they owned, 25 SD70M's wasn't a "good number". On the other hand, they aquired 101 C44-9W's shortly after the 25 SD70M's. Now in comparison that is a good number. The SP SD70M's were aquired in 1993, so they were not the "icing on the cake" for UP.you consider 25 units a "good number"??25 may seem small in comparison to UPs later 1000 unit order, but 25 locomotives are not chump change. They represented a sizeable investment, especially for a cash strapped SP at the time. They were purchased right before the merger, so one could logically speculate that these might have been some icing on the cake for the UP folks. I would venture to guess that SP would have bought more SD70s had there been more money available.
thats all they got from SP
Compared to the quantities of other locomotive models on the SP roster and the total number of locomotives they owned, 25 SD70M's wasn't a "good number". On the other hand, they aquired 101 C44-9W's shortly after the 25 SD70M's. Now in comparison that is a good number. The SP SD70M's were aquired in 1993, so they were not the "icing on the cake" for UP.Not to mention the nearly 300 AC44CW's or 200 GP60's.