by RAY
As a former NHRR commuter (Bridgeport/Darien) as well as frequent long-distance rail traveler (Bridgeport/Salt Lake City), I've always been interested in ride quality. To me, the stainless-steel NH equipment from the late 40's were the smoothest-riding cars (at least when new) ever to grace steel rails, MUCH smoother than either Amfleet or Superliners. They actually seemed to "float" to their destination! On the other hand, the New Haven's lightweights from the 30's were the ROUGHEST riding equipment I've ever encountered ANYWHERE (as were the "washboards" in their twilight years).
Interestingly, the heavyweight coaches from the 20's "rumbled" but were quite steady riding.
Though I tried on numerous occasions, I was never able to sample the ride on the low-slung speedsters of the mid-50's: the DAN'L WEBSTER or the JOHN QUINCY ADAMS - they were always "out of service" on the days I purchased tickets. Was the riding quality of these two trains similar, or was one better than the other?
Interestingly, the heavyweight coaches from the 20's "rumbled" but were quite steady riding.
Though I tried on numerous occasions, I was never able to sample the ride on the low-slung speedsters of the mid-50's: the DAN'L WEBSTER or the JOHN QUINCY ADAMS - they were always "out of service" on the days I purchased tickets. Was the riding quality of these two trains similar, or was one better than the other?