by Douglas John Bowen
It's interesting to see the polite debate ensue about proper rail station architecture. Architecture counts. But to folks at NJ-ARP, the issue was, and to some degree still remains, where the station should be/should have been and what function it should have served.
To that end, the new station will be a nice upgrade, but its serviceability will, at best, be status quo ante and not a leap in passenger/customer convenience.
Is the Port Authority "wasting" money? That's debatable, as is seen here. Could it have done better with its dollars? NJ-ARP argues yes, it certainly could have.
To that end, the new station will be a nice upgrade, but its serviceability will, at best, be status quo ante and not a leap in passenger/customer convenience.
Is the Port Authority "wasting" money? That's debatable, as is seen here. Could it have done better with its dollars? NJ-ARP argues yes, it certainly could have.