FWIW, looking at the newly renovated ShipCSX web site for intermodal service lanes, there are currently 7 origin points for domestic/UMAX IM service to Worcester as shown in the attached image. Presumably a portion of this IM service to Worcester comprises containers/TOFC that are bound for Maine. The CSX trains facilitating IM delivery to Worcester are as follows:
- From Indianapolis: Q008 / Q022 (2 day transit)
- From E St Louis: Q008 / Q022 (2 day transit)
- From Cincinnati: Q008 / Q020 (4 day transit)
- From Monterrey Mexico: UP / Q018 (8 day transit)
- From San Antonio TX: UP / Q022 (7 day transit)
- From Bedford Pk Chicago: 0300 cutoff via Q010 / Q022 (2 day transit) and 1600 cutoff via Q020 (2 day transit )
- From Cleveland: Q158 / Q020 (3 day transit)
Assuming there's no re-ordering of cars/containers enroute, I believe this means 7 different origin blocks arrive Worcester on 3 different pig trains from which an IM train or block on a carload train would need to be created for Maine delivery. That incremental work looks to me to be a logistical challenge for what we we have estimated to be a near capacity IM operation. But perhaps a Maine block creation would happen at Dewitt Yard, which I think is larger?
Note that Worcester originates domestic/UMAX IM service to 14 destinations with all but Bedford Park being off CSX. So there's a challenge of blocking Maine originating COFC/TOFC at Worcester or Dewitt, as well.
Also note that no IM service to/from Worcester serves the I-95 or I-81 corridors in the SE US but maybe in the long run this will change once the ex-B&O line between Philly and DC is cleared for domestic double stacked containers. More logistical challenges for Worcester (don't think Dewitt would help here being a bit out of the way)...