The biggest problems with StarTrack revolve around the very high cost of the modules and the fact that they are hard to handle without the proper equipment. they have been tested in heavy rail conditions and performed well. the modules are not poured in place like a side walk. they are a prestressed, pre cast, heavy duty concrete module that comes in many configurations. they do not use ties of any kind. because of their uniform flat base they spread on track vertical forces in a manner that is far superior to track systems employing ties.
In the case of the hoosac, in my opinion, StarTrak would be a superior system that could offer superior long lasting track surface with the added benefit of helping to alleviate the current height issues.
Between the railroad's need to get it up and running asap and a penchant for pursuing lower cost approaches, without a whole train load of mass dot money, I don't think that i'll live to see any StarTrak in the tunnel.
In the case of the hoosac, in my opinion, StarTrak would be a superior system that could offer superior long lasting track surface with the added benefit of helping to alleviate the current height issues.
Between the railroad's need to get it up and running asap and a penchant for pursuing lower cost approaches, without a whole train load of mass dot money, I don't think that i'll live to see any StarTrak in the tunnel.