• All Things Cascades incl Vancouver

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

  by njtmnrrbuff
 
In Vancouver, BC, the routing that Amtrak uses is rather twisty, adding a lot of travel time to the schedule.
  by ExCon90
 
In the summer of 1952 I rode GN's Streamlined Internationals (3 trips daily in each direction, with 2 trainsets, each including a tapered-end obs properly pointed), from Seattle to Vancouver and back, and as I recall we pretty much crawled north of the border, with periods of stopping and waiting, even then.
  by theseaandalifesaver
 
I think even on clear track and with the speed restraints Amtrak takes at least an hour just to get out of Vancouver. Is there a quicker way they could go?
  by NorthWest
 
^Unfortunately not really, without a lot of expensive bridging and tunneling through the middle of a city. It would help if a passenger-only track were added, but for 4-5 passenger trains a day it doesn't make sense.
  by bdawe
 
Well, you know how it is - "no one rides the train because they're slow and they don't come very often. The trains are slow and don't come very often 'cause no one rides them"
  by NorthWest
 
^Not entirely pleased with the situation either, and use the trains several times a year, but am a realist. Until there's a private ROW, things are going to be subject to delays. I'd love to get the bridge at New Westminster fixed because that'd help everyone. I'd also like 517 to stop losing 20-30 minutes at the border and sticking 518 at North Stanwood every night. Unless there's money, none of this will be fixed. It was hard enough to get enough funding so CBP would allow the second round trip north of Bellingham.
  by Suburban Station
 
As it turned out though, the second trip was worth the effort, so why not a third trip?
  by Tadman
 
They're talking of upgrading the West Coast Express, is there a potential for commuter trains to White Rock? That might give the route a critical mass necessary for capital improvements.
  by NorthWest
 
I think that we'll see additional bus round trips before we get more trains; the Bellingham Sub is rather busy as-is. The buses are pretty popular, though.

I really doubt that any route expansion is likely for WCE. For White Rock, buses to an extended Expo Line would be cheaper and probably a lot faster.
  by theseaandalifesaver
 
Buses are only a popular option because:

1. There's more throughout the day and the only trains that go to Vancouver either leave Seattle at 6am or arrive in Vanvouver after midnight.
2. It's cheaper. You can find, and i know from experience, $1.00 tickets from Seattle to Vancouver.
3. It's a hell of a lot faster and generally more reliable.
  by bdawe
 
WRT 3, it's not a hell of a lot faster. Bus schedules are essentially the same as train schedules, at 4 hours or worse.

Which supports my contention that Amtrak could eat the buses if they were priced better and had more frequencies.
  by mtuandrew
 
bdawe wrote:Which supports my contention that Amtrak could eat the buses if they were priced better and had more frequencies.
That’s true across the country on many routes (including several long-distance routes!) And yet, here we are :(
  by theseaandalifesaver
 
I'm not saying i support buses over trains. I travel between Seattle and Vancouver 2-3 times a month and I commute back and forth between Amtrak, Greyhound and Bolt Bus. Every single train I've taken between the two and have delayed by at least 45 minutes. And again, the train times are less than ideal. Especially heading SEA-VAN.

The price for the train isn't the bad. If you book it two weeks in advance, it's usually around $32USD. And the bus averages between $18-25.
  by NorthWest
 
I was talking about the Thruway buses, which extend Cascades trains north of Seattle. Not sure you can book one SEA-VAN without taking the train.
The Oregon POINT ones can be, but they're funded by the state.
  by Tadman
 
mtuandrew wrote:
bdawe wrote:Which supports my contention that Amtrak could eat the buses if they were priced better and had more frequencies.
That’s true across the country on many routes (including several long-distance routes!) And yet, here we are :(
I think there's generally a pretty negative perception of buses. When we see them on movies, it's generally a less glamorous part of town or a character down on their luck. In addition, they are susceptible to traffic and present no options for a cafe. People with resources don't really want to be reminded of their days riding the cheesebox.

That's probably why Amtrak gets away with charging far more than Megabus. I sure wouldn't want a Megabus ride to Vancouver when I could be on a Cascade running along Puget Sound and enjoying a Kokanee beer. I'm guessing Seattle traffic is no better or worse than the CN delays at the bridge.
  • 1
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 46