• Connecticut River Line (Pan Am)

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

  by newpylong
 
Derailed some rax on the diamond apparently.
  by BenH
 
Arlington wrote:That linked page is quirky: photos at top run recent-to-old but paragraphs at bottom run oldest-to-new:
The "quirkiness" on the linked web page has been resolved. Everything now runs oldest-to-newest. Updated images have been posted too.
https://trainsinthevalley.org/northampton-underpass/
  by Arlington
 
Update (with photos) from Northampton:
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php? ... 2310751055" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Shows completed box tunnel with rail above and new one being built (rebar for its bottom)
  by BostonUrbEx
 
That pile has been there for so long and it was massive. I don't understand why the went through the effort (namely $$$) of making the massive pile, and then never came to collect for Permatreat. Probably just burned off a year supply for Permatreat.
  by toddinmass
 
The tie fire didn't burn all the ties, We kept it to about a 300' long pile after we cut a fire break into it. the entire pile is at least 1500-2000' long
  by newpylong
 
New rail dropped Greenfield to South Deerfield. that can only mean one thing, double track...
  by johnpbarlow
 
Yep, for how many daily trains - 2 Vermonters across the Deerfield River bridge to CPF-385 and Vermonters + EDPL/PLED + locals south of the the bridge? Doesn't sound to me like the best investment of taxpayer $ via MassDOT...
  by BostonUrbEx
 
It is only 2 passenger trains a day if you completely ignore the state's other ideas for the corridor, including Springfield-Greenfield service for one.
  by F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Is that really for DT, or just some remaining legacy rail that wasn't replaced a couple years ago and is getting a finish-up now? I haven't seen any Conn River line items for this fiscal year on the CIP except for the Northampton ped tunnel and various deferred closeout costs for work already performed during the big upgrades of 2-3 years ago.


MassDOT's been dropping an asston of CWR all over the state this year, including for replacements that aren't scheduled to start for at least another 2 years. Bulk prices for ribbon must be really good right now the way they've been blitzing these mass drops all spring.
  by newpylong
 
I wouldn't have mentioned that it can only be for double track if there was remaining old rail to be replaced there.
  by newpylong
 
Where is this? Layover for what?
  by newpylong
 
You'd see some information from the state on the site selection process long before they put a tie in the ground. They also wouldn't build it that far north of Greenfield if possible.

My guess is the Lane wants to use rail again http://www.recorder.com/Lane-Constructi ... on-3203791" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
  • 1
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 109