by gokeefe
More agitation in Lewiston-Auburn for rail service. This coming directly from the newspaper itself.
'Perspective' column by Mr. Jonathan Labonte, in the Lewiston Sun-Journal, January 31, 2010
It makes me wonder given the author's apparent knowledge of the subject whether perhaps he is aware of the differences and gives prominence to his own preferred route intentionally.
'Perspective' column by Mr. Jonathan Labonte, in the Lewiston Sun-Journal, January 31, 2010
I can't help but notice that Yarmouth Junction and not Royal Junction keeps coming up, despite indications to the contrary, of the preferred route, from the work at Danville Junction. I take it as a given the Yarmouth Junction - Danville Junction, (SLR) is in better shape than Royal Junction - Danville Junction (MEC), is this in fact correct?
The politics of the timing aside, the announcement this week that Maine has successfully secured federal dollars to invest in rail upgrades for passenger service should be celebrated. While it has been seen as contentious, with Lewiston-Auburn jockeying for position to secure money of its own, the groundwork laid in Freeport and Brunswick over the last decade has made this a no-brainer.
And in a competitive environment nationally, that groundwork likely made the difference. For those carrying the vision of downtown rail service here, the lesson learned should be to build a similar foundation to ensure we are equally competitive, and successful, in future funding opportunities.
The $35 million announcement over the last week will bring the Downeaster train from Portland, through Yarmouth Junction, and on to stops at Freeport and Brunswick. For advocates here in Maine's second largest urban area, this should come as good news, as the route to Lewiston-Auburn must go through Yarmouth.
It makes me wonder given the author's apparent knowledge of the subject whether perhaps he is aware of the differences and gives prominence to his own preferred route intentionally.
gokeefe