Railroad Forums 

  • POSE / SEPO (Portland - Selkirk trains)

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

 #1445551  by MEC407
 
Video by 16th Ave Productions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Qp94xd3N8k" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 #1490003  by johnpbarlow
 
Didn't CSX operate Q274/Q293 Ford auto rack trains on a Worcester-Ayer turn trackage rights basis back in the pre-Pan Am Guilford era? Or did these auto trains use GRS crews between Worcester and Ayer? I forget...

Is this new arrangement to operate a Q426/Q427 turn due to Pan Am being short on crews? And do Q426/Q427 still handle P&W interchange at Worcester?
 #1490011  by CPF363
 
In the Conrail days, ML-438 and ML-439 ran autos with a Conrail crew. It was a turn job from somewhere out on the B&A, possibly Springfield. Wonder if CSX is going to insist that the Worcester Route's speed limit be raised to at least 25 MPH if their crews are running over it. That is why SEPO/POSE can't make the entire Worcester to Rigby run with one crew, in addition to the bottleneck that is the Hill Yard and the slow running to Lowell Jct.
 #1490020  by neman2
 
If the trains are running with CSX crews and power over Pan Am owned tracks to Ayer, how does the revenue get divided up? It seems that this would be a loss in revenue to Pan Am.
 #1491430  by riffian
 
Noticed on another site frequent recent mention of trains AY/PO and PO/AY. Is this the new nomenclature for the former Selkirk-Portland symbols now that CSX runs directly to Ayer yard??
 #1491478  by Trinnau
 
No, this is actually bottled water on containers that is bound for the intermodal ramp in Ayer. The symbol has been used occasionally prior to that when volume accumulated at either location sufficient to run a dedicated train. If you think about it, Pan Am has been using the train's origin, Selkirk, as part of the symbol and not the train's origin on Pan AM, Worcester or Barbers. So no need for a symbol change just because a CSX crew is handling it about 25 more miles.
Last edited by MEC407 on Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total. Reason: unnecessary quoting
 #1491479  by newpylong
 
Plus the train would need a full Class I brake test in Ayer if the symbol changes from SE to AY. In the FRA's eyes that's a different train and would render the previous test null.
Last edited by newpylong on Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 #1491540  by 690
 
All they need to do is a Class III, because they're only swapping power. Changing the symbol has nothing to do with a brake test, since Ayer isn't the initial terminal. If CSX failed to provide a brake slip, then they would have to perform a Class I test.
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10